Re: I love it when authors criticise their own work many years after the original release.
Macharius Send a noteboard - 14/02/2011 05:49:06 PM
Currently rereading Knots and Crosses by Ian Rankin. It's his first Rebus novel.
The foreword to this edition is by Ian Rankin, and he's quite critical of his younger self, mocking word choice and things like that.
I haven't read the book, but I'm amused he'd criticize his own work to such an extent. To engage in an equally absurd game of "if only", it's quite possible that if he'd written the book then as he would want to now, it wouldn't have achieved the popularity or win an award because it would be a different book. It's not quite a direct comparison, but we've seen all the time series and authors whose later works/series installments were clearly inferior works than the books written earlier.
I love it when authors criticise their own work many years after the original release.
14/02/2011 05:34:38 PM
- 926 Views
Re: I love it when authors criticise their own work many years after the original release.
14/02/2011 05:49:06 PM
- 647 Views
Re: I love it when authors criticise their own work many years after the original release.
14/02/2011 05:59:20 PM
- 613 Views
Rowling has talked about having problems with book 1, but
14/02/2011 06:56:10 PM
- 994 Views
she could make changes and release special editions. Fans love that.
15/02/2011 01:44:16 AM
- 603 Views
Except that the later books generally compensate for it...
15/02/2011 01:54:58 AM
- 658 Views
There were surprises in later books that should have at least been hinted at earlier. *NM*
15/02/2011 10:49:49 PM
- 257 Views
Didn't Stephen King do a revised version of The Gunslinger? *NM*
15/02/2011 11:29:42 PM
- 218 Views
I have it. It is terrible.
16/02/2011 03:43:16 AM
- 591 Views
Much of the older King work is better than his newer stuff. Same with George Lucas.
04/03/2011 04:04:17 AM
- 527 Views
Re: I want JKR's thoughts on her last book. The first is much better. *NM*
22/02/2011 04:58:21 AM
- 248 Views