I was certain that at one point, there was intentional fraud along the lines of the old "change scam" where the person asks to change a twenty, then changes his mind about how the change should be split and gives one of the tens in exchange for ten ones, then says, "Forget it", gives that back and asks for the original twenty back, having already pocketed one ten. Monsieur Lheureux (and, as it later turns out, the notary) were probably used to running that sort of scheme.
I can see the book being turned into a socialist metaphor with relative ease as a result. Emma, the everyman, is seduced by false promises that society makes about wealth and happiness and becomes a slave to the banking and merchant class (Lheureux and the notary) and is used by the ruling classes (Rodolphe and Léon), and the peasants around her who might have sympathized with her plight and organized to help her are kept down with ignorance and festivals, while the urban proletariat is alienated from the land and its beauty.
I can see the book being turned into a socialist metaphor with relative ease as a result. Emma, the everyman, is seduced by false promises that society makes about wealth and happiness and becomes a slave to the banking and merchant class (Lheureux and the notary) and is used by the ruling classes (Rodolphe and Léon), and the peasants around her who might have sympathized with her plight and organized to help her are kept down with ignorance and festivals, while the urban proletariat is alienated from the land and its beauty.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Tom on 21/01/2011 at 09:41:35 PM
/Discussion: Madame Bovary
20/01/2011 06:22:50 PM
- 8877 Views
Re: /Review: Madame Bovary
20/01/2011 07:20:36 PM
- 2259 Views
Emma didn't try to transcend her world. She tried to escape it. And she failed. Miserably.
21/01/2011 06:25:36 AM
- 1694 Views
I agree with much of what you say.
20/01/2011 07:57:57 PM
- 2565 Views
I'm glad to hear that the read wasn't easy for you, either.
21/01/2011 06:30:00 AM
- 1682 Views
Yeah, I think it's safe to say some of those words would give even native speakers pause.
21/01/2011 06:37:02 PM
- 2271 Views
I'm certain it was intentional.
21/01/2011 07:21:45 PM
- 1652 Views
I want to read two more "serious" works before skipping over to Druon.
22/01/2011 06:03:09 PM
- 2035 Views
Ambitious.
22/01/2011 06:26:59 PM
- 1857 Views
Re: Ambitious.
25/01/2011 06:20:12 PM
- 2729 Views
I'm halfway through the second part now
20/01/2011 11:58:01 PM
- 1876 Views
My thoughts
24/01/2011 06:48:13 AM
- 2456 Views
Never beats the reader across the head, eh? So what do you make of the ending?
24/01/2011 10:39:06 PM
- 2264 Views
The ending fits with the rest of the book, I believe
24/01/2011 11:04:02 PM
- 2342 Views
Hm. I think maybe it's because you've read the book before, as Tom admitted.
25/01/2011 09:40:36 PM
- 2190 Views
Your comments are one of the reasons I've sworn off translations.
25/01/2011 05:50:33 PM
- 1650 Views