Active Users:1133 Time:23/11/2024 04:08:55 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I thought it was relatively weaker but still interesting Larry Send a noteboard - 13/01/2011 10:02:39 PM
I've had several grad classes on religious history, including a couple on Early Modern English cultural/religious history, so I'm going to be drawn into noticing those things and to find them to be quite fascinating and far from tedious. That's where I figured we'd disagree, since the theological arguments intrigue me, particularly how Milton worked them in throughout his lines.

So at the various points where he was clearly taking a stance on a theological issue, I did notice that, even if I don't have the religious history background to know much about those issues, and I suppose those held a certain amount of interest to me, yes. Unfortunately he has a tendency of beating you around the head with it and going on about the things at length. :P

And what about the astronomy bit? Did you find that quite fascinating too? ;)


You mean where he tries to riff off of Dante? :P

As for the "beating you around the head", I didn't find it to be that way, perhaps because I didn't approach it as reading a polemical work.


(Edit by Legolas just to fix a missing bracket in the quote and make the layout less confusing.)
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
This message last edited by Legolas on 13/01/2011 at 10:13:30 PM
Reply to message
John Milton - Paradise Lost (and Paradise Regained) Legolas - 11/01/2011 11:25:45 PM 1175 Views
Re: John Milton - Paradise Lost (and Paradise Regained) Camilla - 11/01/2011 11:55:35 PM 889 Views
Wow. <<<<Should be over there<<<< ? - 12/01/2011 12:03:38 AM 629 Views
Camilla - 12/01/2011 12:06:39 AM 707 Views
Re: ? - 12/01/2011 12:47:50 AM 665 Views
Re: Camilla - 12/01/2011 12:57:54 AM 732 Views
Re: ? - 12/01/2011 01:32:12 AM 619 Views
The word "book" is a bit misleading, they're really more like chapters. Legolas - 12/01/2011 06:22:38 PM 668 Views
I'm glad we agree on so much. Legolas - 12/01/2011 06:50:27 PM 717 Views
Re: I'm glad we agree on so much. Camilla - 12/01/2011 07:47:21 PM 770 Views
Re: I'm glad we agree on so much. Legolas - 12/01/2011 07:54:37 PM 605 Views
Re: I'm glad we agree on so much. Camilla - 12/01/2011 08:09:46 PM 726 Views
I thought I'd have a short response Larry - 12/01/2011 12:13:48 AM 853 Views
OK, I blogged about my own reaction to it Larry - 12/01/2011 05:26:18 AM 860 Views
Not that much in there that I disagree with, actually. Legolas - 12/01/2011 06:30:28 PM 658 Views
With the utility of the religious discussion in poetic form Larry - 12/01/2011 06:50:30 PM 675 Views
Well, if I'd found really all of those Heaven books boring, I'm not sure I'd have finished it. Legolas - 13/01/2011 09:53:19 PM 673 Views
I thought it was relatively weaker but still interesting Larry - 13/01/2011 10:02:39 PM 594 Views
Re: Well, if I'd found really all of those Heaven books boring, I'm not sure I'd have finished it. Camilla - 13/01/2011 10:32:49 PM 587 Views
I've started to read it three times and put it down due to the style. Tom - 12/01/2011 01:34:24 AM 703 Views
Yeah, if you really dislike the style, it really may not be worth forcing yourself through. Legolas - 12/01/2011 06:33:43 PM 619 Views
I have nothing to say except that I love Christopher Ricks. Ghavrel - 12/01/2011 05:53:41 AM 590 Views
Okay, i think I may change my classic from this to something else now *NM* Stephen - 12/01/2011 02:41:59 PM 386 Views
It certainly wasn't my intention to frighten people off. Like I said, I'm glad I read it. *NM* Legolas - 12/01/2011 06:31:31 PM 316 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes