I enjoyed the realisation that Jehane was the woman shouting in the valley, and I liked the outlaw and his sons, but I am starting to worry about the episodic tendency of the book. I hope it will all be drawn together in some way at the end, and that he is not relying on simply the reflection of real history to justify the narrative. All this strategising had better work out in the end.
I love the image of ibn Khairan and Belmonte laughing their hats off while Jehane is shouting.
I am quite shocked that the priest would betray the family confidence without even consulting Miranda. I cannot imagine the high priest is likely to be terribly tolerant, and I am not sure how much use the boy can be to anyone not actually fighting against Belmonte. But I assume this will have some part to play later on. If it is just a random episode I will be disappointed.
Ibn Khairan's reaction when he is chided after the attempt to kill the children, when he does not get hot chocolate after having hurt his fingers trying to make shadow figres, he remins me of someone, and I cannot remember who. It is dreadfully annoying. It is, I think, another literary crush of mine, but I cannot remember.
The attempt to kill Ines. I take it it is done by Cartada, but set up to look like one of the neighbouring countries; or vice versa? And I assume the king and the doctor have seen through the plot, and will (with all this secrecy) act accordingly. I wonder whether the doctor is someone we have already heard of, or if it is just a random new person.
I am not entirely sure what everyone is getting out of the moonlit water. I take it as a reference to his Kindath councillor, but I am surprised it is not stated more explicitly. Kay chooses to be subtle (that word is never going to be usable again) at random times.
Almalik II seems stupid and weak (but not overdone, I think), and I hope someone will kill him soon. I imagine ibn Khairan will do the deed? I wasn't terribly worried about his killing Belmonte in his room. I seem to remember el Cid dying in another way. But I liked ibn Khairan's reaction to the visit and the news he brought.
In fact, I loved the whole ibn Khairan/Jehane meeting. I have been looking forward to it. I didn't really see why she had to worry about Belmonte. Is that because Kay feels that if Jehane could easily choose between the two men, ibn Khairan would be marked as cooler than Belmonte? I think the obsession with making the two men the same, or at least the same level is taken a little too far, even though I enjoy the symmetry.
That whole "who is dead" scene annoyed me. It was completely overdone, and the mystery did not add anything to the story; quite the contrary. The blow by blow description of the fight was also not my cup of tea at all.
But I am looking forward to seeing how it all draws together in the end.
I love the image of ibn Khairan and Belmonte laughing their hats off while Jehane is shouting.
I am quite shocked that the priest would betray the family confidence without even consulting Miranda. I cannot imagine the high priest is likely to be terribly tolerant, and I am not sure how much use the boy can be to anyone not actually fighting against Belmonte. But I assume this will have some part to play later on. If it is just a random episode I will be disappointed.
Ibn Khairan's reaction when he is chided after the attempt to kill the children, when he does not get hot chocolate after having hurt his fingers trying to make shadow figres, he remins me of someone, and I cannot remember who. It is dreadfully annoying. It is, I think, another literary crush of mine, but I cannot remember.
The attempt to kill Ines. I take it it is done by Cartada, but set up to look like one of the neighbouring countries; or vice versa? And I assume the king and the doctor have seen through the plot, and will (with all this secrecy) act accordingly. I wonder whether the doctor is someone we have already heard of, or if it is just a random new person.
I am not entirely sure what everyone is getting out of the moonlit water. I take it as a reference to his Kindath councillor, but I am surprised it is not stated more explicitly. Kay chooses to be subtle (that word is never going to be usable again) at random times.
Almalik II seems stupid and weak (but not overdone, I think), and I hope someone will kill him soon. I imagine ibn Khairan will do the deed? I wasn't terribly worried about his killing Belmonte in his room. I seem to remember el Cid dying in another way. But I liked ibn Khairan's reaction to the visit and the news he brought.
In fact, I loved the whole ibn Khairan/Jehane meeting. I have been looking forward to it. I didn't really see why she had to worry about Belmonte. Is that because Kay feels that if Jehane could easily choose between the two men, ibn Khairan would be marked as cooler than Belmonte? I think the obsession with making the two men the same, or at least the same level is taken a little too far, even though I enjoy the symmetry.
That whole "who is dead" scene annoyed me. It was completely overdone, and the mystery did not add anything to the story; quite the contrary. The blow by blow description of the fight was also not my cup of tea at all.
But I am looking forward to seeing how it all draws together in the end.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
The Lions of Al-Rassan by Guy Gavriel Kay: the November/December Book Club
18/11/2010 09:33:45 AM
- 1579 Views
Prologue and Part One - the pieces are moved into place.
18/11/2010 09:37:08 AM
- 727 Views
I've read this before, more than once, but I can remember very little of what happens.
18/11/2010 12:58:44 PM
- 882 Views
Re: I've read this before, more than once, but I can remember very little of what happens.
20/12/2010 07:31:10 PM
- 736 Views
Part Two: Exile *NM*
18/11/2010 09:38:21 AM
- 420 Views
I still like it.
22/12/2010 09:27:09 AM
- 914 Views
Part Three
18/11/2010 09:40:26 AM
- 733 Views
Still no major objections
25/12/2010 04:07:43 PM
- 780 Views
Overall thoughts: did you like the book?
18/11/2010 09:41:54 AM
- 750 Views
The characters: Jehane, Ammar, Rodrigo
18/11/2010 09:45:51 AM
- 728 Views
A superficial point:
18/11/2010 08:33:58 PM
- 806 Views
Yes. Phèdre no Delaunay de Montrêve (as opposed to Racine's Phèdre).
18/11/2010 08:37:49 PM
- 648 Views
The technicalities: writing style, plotting, etc.
18/11/2010 09:48:48 AM
- 713 Views
He really does love his drama. (spoilers for late in the book)
18/11/2010 09:02:13 PM
- 808 Views
Re: He really does love his drama. (spoilers for late in the book)
21/11/2010 06:13:32 PM
- 705 Views
Re: He really does love his drama. (spoilers for late in the book)
29/12/2010 03:40:31 PM
- 734 Views
Re: He really does love his drama. (spoilers for late in the book)
29/12/2010 03:39:07 PM
- 811 Views
Because I was amusing myself with this during the read: on meanings of names and places
18/11/2010 03:38:39 PM
- 1223 Views
I wish I had the time and brainpower to do that when reading books.
18/11/2010 07:48:30 PM
- 728 Views
Actually, I'm not sure if it really enhanced the reading experience.
18/11/2010 08:11:29 PM
- 724 Views
Hm.
18/11/2010 08:15:32 PM
- 926 Views
Supposedly it's based on Italy? But yeah, maybe that's only superficial.
18/11/2010 08:25:54 PM
- 844 Views
A note on your Tigana comment..
18/11/2010 08:24:24 PM
- 762 Views
I did not catch all of those. Certainly not the arabic name-references.
29/12/2010 11:53:46 PM
- 890 Views
Us and Them: how can we do this to each other?
21/11/2010 06:07:46 PM
- 737 Views