Active Users:172 Time:12/04/2025 02:12:48 AM
I think you are conflating the text and the book. Camilla Send a noteboard - 11/12/2010 05:04:37 PM
I think your argument is confused here.

The question of whether we evaluate literature based on how it sells, and how much is paid for it, and the question of how to support authors so that they can write good books for us without having an independent fortune are separate, and you are tying them together in a way which I think is unfair to both.

Until there is some separate way of funding writing, you cannot use that argument in favour of pirating books.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
E-books, piracy, and the commodification of literature - 08/12/2010 02:31:00 AM 1272 Views
So we shouldn't just hook up writers to huge hamster wheels and force them to write and run? - 08/12/2010 04:58:16 AM 1327 Views
I agree with most of what you say, Tom - 09/12/2010 03:16:48 AM 913 Views
Let us say "materialistic culture". - 09/12/2010 03:30:39 AM 904 Views
That'll work - 09/12/2010 03:41:18 AM 812 Views
Speaking of camels through the eyes of needles... - 10/12/2010 03:09:09 AM 786 Views
Re: Speaking of camels through the eyes of needles... - 10/12/2010 11:25:41 AM 864 Views
Discussions of ebook piracy are largely irrelevant until more people use e-readers. - 08/12/2010 10:41:40 AM 903 Views
E-piracy is a symptom, not a cause - 09/12/2010 03:22:05 AM 879 Views
Uhm, or they just want to read and can't afford to spend money on books? - 10/12/2010 05:56:53 PM 775 Views
Re: E-books, piracy, and the commodification of literature - 09/12/2010 03:46:39 AM 871 Views
I'm with you. - 11/12/2010 01:34:54 PM 891 Views
Authors get compensated for libraries. *NM* - 11/12/2010 05:05:30 PM 381 Views
That varies by location. - 11/12/2010 08:07:52 PM 874 Views
I think you are conflating the text and the book. - 11/12/2010 05:04:37 PM 900 Views
That's not my argument at all - 11/12/2010 08:13:36 PM 816 Views
The whole thing gets even weirder with libraries. - 13/12/2010 04:46:15 PM 984 Views

Reply to Message