Oddly enough, it was Marxism that helped to contribute massively to the society that we have, at least Marxism as developed in the Leninist model. In place of a cult of consumerism, communism created a cult of production for the sake of production, without any attempt to quantify demand or reasons for the production. This, coupled with dialectical materialism, helped to essentially ensure that there was no alternative to a materialistic (in all senses of the word) society other than backwards traditionalist societies like Afghanistan. The communist erosion of spiritual values went hand in hand with the capitalist erosion of spiritual values. The emphasis on things was there as well, but instead of personal possessions it was pride in how much grain the collective could send to Moscow or Beijing, how much steel a factory could produce, how many pairs of size 12 boots, how many locomotives...
What is needed today is a spiritual movement that emphasizes the individual's responsibility for spiritual growth and self-criticism coupled with a strong sense of a modern morality (essentially, don't do things to people they don't want done to them, respect their right to live differently and let each person handle the spiritual quest in his own way, be and do rather than have, and rise above petty displays of conspicuous consumption and wealth). Simple living, a clean environment, an absence of too much "stuff", and a focus on experiences.
What is needed today is a spiritual movement that emphasizes the individual's responsibility for spiritual growth and self-criticism coupled with a strong sense of a modern morality (essentially, don't do things to people they don't want done to them, respect their right to live differently and let each person handle the spiritual quest in his own way, be and do rather than have, and rise above petty displays of conspicuous consumption and wealth). Simple living, a clean environment, an absence of too much "stuff", and a focus on experiences.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
E-books, piracy, and the commodification of literature
08/12/2010 02:31:00 AM
- 1201 Views
So we shouldn't just hook up writers to huge hamster wheels and force them to write and run?
08/12/2010 04:58:16 AM
- 1255 Views
I agree with most of what you say, Tom
09/12/2010 03:16:48 AM
- 840 Views
Let us say "materialistic culture".
09/12/2010 03:30:39 AM
- 839 Views
That'll work
09/12/2010 03:41:18 AM
- 743 Views
I think that the idea of "the commodification of literature" is one that is flawed
08/12/2010 07:53:50 AM
- 964 Views
Discussions of ebook piracy are largely irrelevant until more people use e-readers.
08/12/2010 10:41:40 AM
- 836 Views
E-piracy is a symptom, not a cause
09/12/2010 03:22:05 AM
- 817 Views
Uhm, or they just want to read and can't afford to spend money on books?
10/12/2010 05:56:53 PM
- 711 Views
Re: E-books, piracy, and the commodification of literature
09/12/2010 03:46:39 AM
- 806 Views
Sorry...as soon as you said you injected Marxist ideas into it I had to stop reading...otherwise
19/12/2010 06:10:12 AM
- 752 Views