Active Users:649 Time:25/11/2024 01:58:37 PM
Julian Barnes on translation Camilla Send a noteboard - 18/11/2010 05:49:37 PM
more specifically on a new English translation of Madame Bovary. Before you stop reading, read this excerpt from the very beginning of the article:

If you go to the website of the restaurant L’Huîtrière (3, rue des Chats Bossus, Lille) and click on ‘translate’, the zealous automaton you have stirred up will instantly render everything into English, including the address. And it comes out as ‘3 street cats humped’. Translation is clearly too important a task to be left to machines. But what sort of human should it be given to?

Since I only clicked on it to keep myself from going insane from essay marking, I don't have time to comment too extensively. But I wanted to share. In part because the question of translation came up a couple of weeks ago.

Thoughts?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
lrb
Reply to message
Julian Barnes on translation - 18/11/2010 05:49:37 PM 950 Views
That was a long article. - 19/11/2010 07:05:12 PM 544 Views
Re: That was a long article. - 19/11/2010 09:59:24 PM 529 Views
Yeah, I think English translations on average are better than those in smaller languages. - 19/11/2010 10:16:44 PM 642 Views
Wow - 20/11/2010 10:45:08 AM 686 Views
Traddutore, traditore - 20/11/2010 12:36:10 PM 638 Views
On balance, I'm glad I read the Steegmuller translation when I read the novel. - 20/11/2010 05:14:42 PM 485 Views
Vas-tu faire s’enculée, Camille! - 20/11/2010 05:26:08 PM 568 Views
If you don't mind a few grammatical corrections of your swearing... - 20/11/2010 05:42:57 PM 576 Views
It was a quick and dirty rendering - 20/11/2010 05:53:13 PM 517 Views
Apparently so, with the use of "enculer" - 20/11/2010 07:12:24 PM 532 Views
Actually, yes, it is The Temptation of St. Anthony - 20/11/2010 08:43:08 PM 601 Views
And I didn't order from France. It's a US-based company that I bought it from. *NM* - 20/11/2010 05:54:55 PM 222 Views
Oh, that'd cut down on delivery costs a fair bit, then. *NM* - 20/11/2010 06:01:46 PM 229 Views
Yes, it did. - 20/11/2010 08:45:13 PM 492 Views
I love Pleiade editions - 21/11/2010 12:14:14 AM 506 Views
How tall are they, out of curiosity? - 21/11/2010 12:50:57 AM 651 Views
Not tall - 21/11/2010 09:59:55 AM 521 Views
I got my books today. - 23/11/2010 05:38:20 AM 735 Views
Re: I got my books today. - 23/11/2010 10:33:10 AM 556 Views
Regardless, if Pleiade is the best France has to offer, their book industry is awful. - 23/11/2010 07:17:13 PM 789 Views
Let me guess... - 23/11/2010 07:46:41 PM 502 Views
No. I don't think he's been released in a Pleiade edition. - 23/11/2010 07:49:05 PM 523 Views
Re: Oh Authorial intent. - 21/11/2010 02:07:27 AM 632 Views
Like hell it's about authorial intent. - 21/11/2010 05:40:22 AM 566 Views
Re: I didn't even read it, I guessed based on the author's initials. - 21/11/2010 01:37:40 PM 754 Views
So I take it you missed the whole part about Nabokov's translation of Eugene Onegin. - 21/11/2010 03:28:14 PM 508 Views
Re: Yes, I missed all of that. Such a conclusion clearly follows from my previous response. *NM* - 21/11/2010 03:57:16 PM 313 Views
Actually it does. Your responses are just cheap tricks, not discussions. *NM* - 21/11/2010 04:44:21 PM 231 Views
Re: Cheap tricks? - 21/11/2010 10:45:39 PM 603 Views
Barnes' article has little to do with authorial intent - 21/11/2010 11:37:25 PM 544 Views
Why didn't you translate je ne sais quoi? - 21/11/2010 11:46:23 PM 597 Views
Because I didn't feel like it? - 22/11/2010 01:14:31 AM 571 Views
Well, I think you started the snarky replies. - 21/11/2010 11:42:33 PM 517 Views

Reply to Message