You're aware that living trees convert CO2 into oxygen, right?
They store the carbon. That is their envornmental function. They are carbon repositories. When they die, and rot, carbon is re-released. This does not happen with books.
And when they are chopped down, new trees are planted (and they continue the whole photosynthesis thing) in their stead, because the paper companies need trees.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
e-Readers
08/10/2010 12:12:55 PM
- 1068 Views
even a large collection of books does not use enough wood to be an issue
08/10/2010 04:23:10 PM
- 793 Views
I suppose there is some green benefits...
08/10/2010 06:19:34 PM
- 725 Views
One question: (for any Kindle user)
08/10/2010 10:19:08 PM
- 830 Views
Ick
08/10/2010 07:55:17 PM
- 776 Views
Camilla, you're a great lady, but you're almost a walking parody sometimes.
08/10/2010 11:07:04 PM
- 830 Views
Honestly, I couldn't have given a rat's ass about its environmental impact.
08/10/2010 11:06:06 PM
- 823 Views
Your statement about forests shows you don't know about modern forestry
09/10/2010 02:06:07 PM
- 747 Views
Re: Your statement about forests shows you don't know about modern forestry
09/10/2010 04:43:28 PM
- 703 Views
I'm not going to make the obvious comments in response to the phrase "native bush".
10/10/2010 05:40:26 AM
- 681 Views
I'm planning to buy an Ipad in a month or two
09/10/2010 03:13:48 PM
- 708 Views
You can't read on an iPad any more than you can read on a laptop. *NM*
09/10/2010 09:19:22 PM
- 317 Views
Oh, I can only read 3-4 hours at a time, then?
10/10/2010 06:33:28 AM
- 734 Views