Active Users:864 Time:21/11/2024 10:01:11 PM
Yes, I saw it more as a criticism (satire?) of obsessive academia than a love-story. Tim Send a noteboard - 07/07/2010 10:34:12 AM
The "factory" metaphor was particularly damning. I think the parallel love-stories were meant to be the sugar-coating around the bitter pill in the centre. Though the C19 love-story was much more enjoyable to read than the C20 one, which just seemed contrived.

I like how the morbidity of the academics' pursuit slowly grows until it reaches the end-point of grave-robbery. (Whited out as this may be seen as a spoiler). Your point about spiritualism is also apt.

I think "infamous" is the right word for the poems. Christabel LaMotte's were bloody awful (IMO). I quite liked Ash's though. Is that a symptom of being male? :P

About interpretation: I don't think the poems are meant to be there as poems, for you to interpret as you wish in their own right. They're devices, ersatz poems, contrived for the sake of the novel they're in. They are the way they are (trite, pretentious, or whatever) because their being that way serves the purposes of the novel. Such flaws as they have are deliberate. I can see why this is frustrating for a poetry lover – they're like a cardboard cut-out of a sex symbol instead of the real thing – but you've got to hand it to Byatt that writing poetry that's bad in exactly the way you want it to be shows incredible skill. It's like a virtuoso trying to sing off-key on purpose – so much more difficult than doing it well.
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
/Other Liteature: Possession by A.S. Byatt - 06/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 5266 Views
Re: Excuse me. I have a very clear recollection of writing to you about Possession. - 06/07/2010 06:43:34 PM 1624 Views
I'm sure I did too. - 06/07/2010 07:00:06 PM 1524 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. - 07/07/2010 12:05:16 AM 1481 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. - 07/07/2010 08:32:29 AM 1460 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. - 07/07/2010 09:04:15 AM 1530 Views
Hm. - 10/07/2010 12:55:20 AM 1439 Views
The main reason for my love of the book are the letters, I would say. - 24/07/2010 10:00:13 PM 1450 Views
Re: Excuse me. I have a very clear recollection of writing to you about Possession. - 07/07/2010 12:04:03 AM 1563 Views
Re: No no. I talked about - 07/07/2010 12:49:30 AM 1437 Views
Re: No no. I talked about - 07/07/2010 09:01:28 AM 1699 Views
Yes, I saw it more as a criticism (satire?) of obsessive academia than a love-story. - 07/07/2010 10:34:12 AM 1468 Views
Coincidentally, it was also a digested read in the Guardian. - 09/07/2010 03:48:09 PM 1679 Views
Meh.... - 09/07/2010 07:54:12 PM 1620 Views
Awww. - 10/07/2010 12:54:44 AM 1464 Views
Re: Awww. - 10/07/2010 07:14:37 PM 1661 Views
Re: Meh.... - 10/07/2010 11:24:43 AM 1475 Views
Re: Meh.... - 10/07/2010 07:15:29 PM 1569 Views

Reply to Message