I went and searched a bit, and yes, seems it does include the Appendices.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 30/06/2010 10:47:18 PM
Arvedui does indeed get about two dozen mentions - one reason why he gets more than ultimately more important people is that his story is sort of told twice in Appendix A, once in the history of Arnor part, once in the history of Gondor part. In LotR itself, the Index claims he's mentioned exactly once, and in a footnote at that.
And yeah, if it does include the Appendices, it would explain why Arvedui is in the list and Elbereth, Beren, Luthien, Earendil, and so on are not, even if they're mentioned many more times in the text - Elbereth is mentioned in at least ten different places according to the Index. I would suspect Helm Hammerhand makes it to 29 mentions without counting Helm's Deep - you'd get to a fair few more then. Helm gets to 21 mentions in four pages in the Appendices, so then 29 total isn't that much. People like Eorl, Thorin and Durin likely get most of their mentions in the Appendices, too.
And yeah, if it does include the Appendices, it would explain why Arvedui is in the list and Elbereth, Beren, Luthien, Earendil, and so on are not, even if they're mentioned many more times in the text - Elbereth is mentioned in at least ten different places according to the Index. I would suspect Helm Hammerhand makes it to 29 mentions without counting Helm's Deep - you'd get to a fair few more then. Helm gets to 21 mentions in four pages in the Appendices, so then 29 total isn't that much. People like Eorl, Thorin and Durin likely get most of their mentions in the Appendices, too.
Lord of the Rings character quiz on Sporcle
25/06/2010 04:09:13 PM
- 1215 Views
38 - getting them all or close to all would be impressive indeed.
25/06/2010 05:30:33 PM
- 688 Views
46. - But that was trial and error
25/06/2010 06:35:02 PM
- 712 Views
I know! So weird.
25/06/2010 10:19:07 PM
- 740 Views
Re: Basically I think we are judging by importance of role/status. The game judges by number.
25/06/2010 11:45:42 PM
- 701 Views
I realize, but you'd think the two would coincide more.
26/06/2010 12:19:05 AM
- 697 Views
Re: Not in The Lord of the Rings, where phenomenal amounts of backstory
26/06/2010 12:30:51 AM
- 832 Views
It just registers every time the word is said. Tom Bombadil couldn't stop talking about the bitch.
26/06/2010 01:17:42 AM
- 760 Views
Re: 45. (naming a few names)
25/06/2010 11:44:02 PM
- 821 Views
I had my fair share of names I didn't know, too, but I can help with those...
26/06/2010 12:39:09 AM
- 678 Views
Bill is both the pony, and the nosy jerk in Bree (who they bought the pony from I think)
29/06/2010 03:16:18 AM
- 984 Views
35 as well, and I'm retarded/haven't thought about LotR in way too long....
26/06/2010 01:18:51 AM
- 804 Views
29. I'm awesome. Virtually everyone I remembered was from the movies.
26/06/2010 06:59:41 AM
- 727 Views
I've not read the books for about 7 years.
26/06/2010 09:46:38 AM
- 767 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years.
26/06/2010 10:51:33 AM
- 722 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years.
26/06/2010 10:54:59 AM
- 746 Views
Re: I've not read the books for about 7 years.
26/06/2010 10:56:43 AM
- 678 Views
27. I almost forgot Sauron and spend ages trying to recall what the spider was called in English *NM*
26/06/2010 04:24:21 PM
- 383 Views
38. Of the 12 I missed, 8 were dead t/o the series
29/06/2010 02:14:31 PM
- 703 Views
Re: 38. Of the 12 I missed, 8 were dead t/o the series
29/06/2010 03:31:19 PM
- 743 Views
I went and searched a bit, and yes, seems it does include the Appendices.
30/06/2010 10:47:18 PM
- 790 Views