Generally any work is better in the original media it was intended for. There are always exceptions to the rule though... I just can't think of any off hand
2001 is sort of one, if I'm remembering correctly it was a joint film and book.
2001 is sort of one, if I'm remembering correctly it was a joint film and book.
Kick-Ass is the same. They wrote the screenplay while they wrote the book.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Film to book adaptations.
27/05/2010 11:48:53 AM
- 925 Views
I think it is a similar rule
27/05/2010 12:15:07 PM
- 662 Views
Re: I think it is a similar rule
27/05/2010 12:29:30 PM
- 701 Views
I guess in theory they can be good but all the onesI have read sucked
27/05/2010 05:43:55 PM
- 593 Views
I kind of feel like a film to book adaption is not....really a book?
27/05/2010 09:16:25 PM
- 918 Views
I read The Phantom Menace by Terry Brooks.
27/05/2010 09:22:30 PM
- 618 Views
Same here.
28/05/2010 12:53:28 AM
- 702 Views
Ask a ten year old how he likes the film *NM*
28/05/2010 08:25:22 AM
- 306 Views
Exactly. I loved the film so much I freaked out when I saw the book in a Motel giftstore.
29/05/2010 03:22:45 AM
- 697 Views
I think Ladyhawke by Joan D. Vinge is one. Haven't read it yet. *NM*
27/05/2010 11:18:43 PM
- 321 Views