I don't remember the first chapter but I read the book about 4-5 months ago and enjoyed it. I really thought Simmons excelled in suffusing the novel with a dark and dank atmosphere that was a combination of the gritty London underbelly, drug-induced mania and the occult. I felt the novel was dripping with that grimy feeling and it played immensely well for the story.
It feels like he is holding up a sign that says "I read Edwin Drood! I did! Look! Oh, and I really don't like Wilkie Collins" while jumping up and down.
The narration seems confused at best. I suspect it is an attempt at an untrustworthy narrator, but it is just jarring. And the language leaves a lot to be desired.
But you are I should keep reading because it gets better?
I knew/know almost nothing about Dickens or Wilkie Collins before reading it which may have helped protect me from what you're experiencing. You're guess about the narrator being untrustworthy is a good one
I liked it from an atmospheric standpoint. I'm not a stickler for really good writing if I'm being entertained in other ways. I found the language fine. I literally felt sort of grimy after reading the book, so thick was the imagery of the setting and the less than scrupulous behavior of the characters, etc.
Like I said, maybe being ignorant of the subject matter in this case was perhaps a good thing for me as a reader. In any event, I enjoyed it.
Formerly DannyBoy31
Does Simmons' Drood get any better?
14/05/2010 02:32:25 PM
- 720 Views
What did you dislike about it?
14/05/2010 03:16:25 PM
- 599 Views
Re: What did you dislike about it?
14/05/2010 03:19:34 PM
- 561 Views
Hmm.
14/05/2010 03:30:14 PM
- 628 Views
Oh no . I saw that in the bookstore and was planning on buying it at some point...
15/05/2010 05:46:02 AM
- 559 Views
Re: Oh no . I saw that in the bookstore and was planning on buying it at some point...
15/05/2010 10:05:24 AM
- 561 Views
Don't do it! Simmons will only betray you. This is a Custerd level No! *NM*
26/05/2010 09:03:44 PM
- 222 Views