and I agree that the first chapter does not work. But apparently it works for a lot of people. And it works, and has some better moments, when you reread it (like Pestle's shoe thing in the empty place). But I liked and read the book despite it, not because of it.
I am not sure why you should need my forgiveness (although if I had not had a glass of wine or so, I might come after you for naming him "Babycakes"), though. I was not annoyed about repetition. Do you mean repetition of information?
I am not sure why you should need my forgiveness (although if I had not had a glass of wine or so, I might come after you for naming him "Babycakes"), though. I was not annoyed about repetition. Do you mean repetition of information?
Thief of Time - pratchett
Anansi Boys - Gaiman
Both deal with a single entity split in two - one at birth, the other - I no longer remember. Something about Anansi Boys is very slippery, I always need to reread it because I forget.
Anyway. I randomly decided that the narrator was either unrequitedly in love with Gonzo or his split-off inner self. (I do admire Harkaway's use of the unreliable narrator here, however boring the narrator in question is.)
At the moment, what comes to mind in terms of explanations is Babycakes' explanation of corporate drones, their levels, and how they are made. I think we see it, in varying forms, at least three times in the novel. Each time it is very clever, but it is still the same information over and over. If I had been his editor I'd've said, Nick Harkaway, you are very clever, but most of your readers are going to either read very slowly or be quick enough to catch up with you on the second repetition. Save it for your next novel. Or blog. Or letter to your mum. Anywhere but here!
http://coolingpearls.wordpress.com/
http://uncategoricallyroh.wordpress.com/
http://whaq.blogspot.com/
~Roh
http://uncategoricallyroh.wordpress.com/
http://whaq.blogspot.com/
~Roh
The Gone-Away World by Nick Harkaway
10/05/2010 06:01:50 PM
- 5376 Views
Which Gaiman and Pratchett? *SPOILERS*
10/05/2010 09:51:01 PM
- 1547 Views
Re: *SPOILERS* MAJORLY.
10/05/2010 09:57:01 PM
- 1471 Views
Nice review! I'll read it at some point, in time for the book club if not earlier...
10/05/2010 09:55:22 PM
- 1470 Views
Re: I'm resigned to being the only person who didn't like it.
10/05/2010 09:58:10 PM
- 1525 Views
It did not remind me of Buffy.
10/05/2010 10:00:41 PM
- 1449 Views
Re: SPOILERS for season seven of Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
10/05/2010 10:18:45 PM
- 1489 Views
Re: SPOILERS for season seven of Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
10/05/2010 10:26:13 PM
- 1496 Views
I don't like it so far. About 150-200 pages in. Not impressed.
10/05/2010 10:02:21 PM
- 1498 Views
Why are you not impressed? *NM*
10/05/2010 10:16:29 PM
- 763 Views
Re: SPOILERS
10/05/2010 10:22:52 PM
- 1483 Views
Re: SPOILERS
10/05/2010 10:28:06 PM
- 1429 Views
This is a weak novel.
11/05/2010 03:50:01 PM
- 1430 Views
This is one of the books you really should not judge until you've finished it *NM*
11/05/2010 04:15:23 PM
- 787 Views