Just to ask.....are the first 3 books essentially a trilogy?
trzaska2000 Send a noteboard - 05/09/2009 05:47:14 PM
A couple of months ago, a kind poster gave be a great summary of the problems (timing of new books) of the series. This issue has caused me to stay away from starting the series (RJ/WoT syndrome).
However, I was told that reading the first 3 books is satisfying and has a pretty clear ending.....is this true? If yes, maybe I give them a shot!
However, I was told that reading the first 3 books is satisfying and has a pretty clear ending.....is this true? If yes, maybe I give them a shot!
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by trzaska2000 on 05/09/2009 at 05:49:09 PM
So... A Game of Thrones
04/09/2009 03:52:25 PM
- 1304 Views
Re: Meh. *NM*
04/09/2009 03:54:32 PM
- 354 Views
What a scintillating contribution you've made
04/09/2009 03:58:55 PM
- 986 Views
Re: It was an excellent summation of my feelings on the matter!
04/09/2009 04:50:15 PM
- 1047 Views
I've missed you, Mr Darcy. <3
04/09/2009 05:21:05 PM
- 940 Views
Re: I love you, Sir Lucas whose first name I have forgotten. (William?)
05/09/2009 12:31:20 PM
- 921 Views
'Game' was good. The rest go downhill fast, though.
04/09/2009 04:53:57 PM
- 858 Views
I always like it when people post this.
04/09/2009 05:52:50 PM
- 843 Views
Oh alright, so there was a bit of exaggeration. (very slight real spoilers)
04/09/2009 06:18:13 PM
- 731 Views
If you keep up the 15-year delay, you may not have to wait to read the fifth book...
05/09/2009 01:28:52 AM
- 735 Views
Just to ask.....are the first 3 books essentially a trilogy?
05/09/2009 05:47:14 PM
- 691 Views
More or less
05/09/2009 06:59:53 PM
- 624 Views
You were that "kind poster!"
06/09/2009 04:09:53 AM
- 590 Views
A few moments like that, yes.
06/09/2009 01:16:06 PM
- 690 Views
Very cool, after Warbreaker, I may give GRRM a shot.....thanks! *NM*
06/09/2009 07:37:47 PM
- 328 Views