Quite apart from the fact that I really struggled to understand this book (suspect I may need to read it again someday to try again), I couldn't decide whether the ocean was in fact sentient and deliberately sending the Visitors, or whether it was just some kind of ... chemical, I guess, effect of being so close to it with human minds.
This was not exactly the first time mankind had experimented on the planet and its ocean and yet it had never "responded" in this way before. It was only after Sartorius shot the Hell out of it with x-rays that the visitors showed up. Interestingly, they tried to communicate via that method again but this time encoding actual EEG patterns in the x-rays rather than just enormous bursts of random energy. The planet never seemingly responded. What does this mean?
I think it could mean that there was just some kind of response to that particular stimulus (the first x-rays). Could this imply that the researchers actually caused the visitors in some kind of physics-type reaction via the x-rays? I think that could be a valid argument.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Sci-Fi Book Club: SOLARIS by Stanislaw Lem
19/04/2010 05:50:45 PM
- 1897 Views
Roll-Call: Have you read it? Are you reading it? Like it: Yes/NO? *NM*
19/04/2010 05:52:00 PM
- 662 Views
I just finished it.
19/04/2010 06:54:49 PM
- 1147 Views
Yes, I read it. Must be something like... eh. it was before the clooney horror movie came out? *NM*
19/04/2010 07:23:15 PM
- 676 Views
I'm currently reading it
20/04/2010 10:00:05 AM
- 1356 Views
I am with you on that. It may not be rational or my reasons have to do with vanity
20/04/2010 11:18:53 PM
- 922 Views
Re: When you look through Lem's page on Solaris covers, that one is the least interesting.
24/04/2010 10:01:50 AM
- 1044 Views
Translation:
19/04/2010 05:54:57 PM
- 1245 Views
English translation by Joanna Kilmartin and Steve Cox (1970).
19/04/2010 06:56:54 PM
- 1113 Views
Translation of a translation, actually. *NM*
19/04/2010 07:22:18 PM
- 600 Views
Yes, I did read Jake's intro piece there. *NM*
19/04/2010 07:23:44 PM
- 604 Views
Read a swedish translation back then.
19/04/2010 07:28:14 PM
- 1028 Views
Yes, the version I read was translated from polish. All the names were intact from the original *NM*
20/04/2010 12:17:42 AM
- 601 Views
1970 translation from French to English by Joanna Kilmartin and Steve Cox
20/04/2010 02:20:42 AM
- 1213 Views
Re: Does anyone know why the Polish publishers haven't commissioned another translation?
24/04/2010 10:04:38 AM
- 1071 Views
So. Uh. The chick's name was Rheya in the book I read. Not in other translations?
19/04/2010 07:42:16 PM
- 1088 Views
Her name in the original is Harey, it got changed to Rheya somewhere along the way of the
19/04/2010 07:49:33 PM
- 1104 Views
I haven't looked into the reasons yet, outside of what would seem obvious,
19/04/2010 09:26:11 PM
- 1128 Views
Re: I think the translators just thought Harey wasn't immediately accessible as a feminine name.
24/04/2010 09:59:17 AM
- 1184 Views
Literature vs. Genre Fiction
21/04/2010 02:33:21 PM
- 1149 Views
Re:
21/04/2010 09:09:02 PM
- 1042 Views
How do you know Solaris was an advanced intelligence?
22/04/2010 01:20:35 AM
- 975 Views
It's definitely literature
22/04/2010 01:19:34 AM
- 910 Views
You might be winning me over to your thoughts here.
26/04/2010 09:42:33 PM
- 901 Views
In all fairness to my opponents, Solaris is one of my strongest cases.
26/04/2010 10:16:20 PM
- 859 Views
As long as you realize...
26/04/2010 10:26:00 PM
- 939 Views
This is why I sort of float around on this issue.
27/04/2010 05:49:39 PM
- 986 Views
Re: This is why I sort of float around on this issue.
13/05/2010 10:15:38 AM
- 1014 Views
What didn't you enjoy?
21/04/2010 09:47:06 PM
- 916 Views
I didn't like the excessive description of the types of clouds on Solaris.
22/04/2010 01:17:22 AM
- 887 Views
Re: I didn't like the excessive description of the types of clouds on Solaris.
23/04/2010 03:33:14 AM
- 967 Views
Re: I found it made this stark contrast with his descriptions of his own, more human environment.
24/04/2010 09:56:40 AM
- 1169 Views
So, is there really anything to discuss about the story itself?
22/04/2010 08:55:03 AM
- 1092 Views
Apparently not.
22/04/2010 01:38:24 PM
- 1143 Views
Point of fact,
23/04/2010 02:53:47 PM
- 1014 Views
Perhaps it's time for a self-reevaluation then
24/04/2010 10:45:44 AM
- 1342 Views
They never claimed to have a monopoly on guiding the discussions. I am just happy they are starting
25/04/2010 05:51:01 PM
- 974 Views
Thank you for telling me how I should prioritize my life, Larry.
26/04/2010 04:54:01 PM
- 1146 Views
At least I am not as quick to repeat the same excuses
26/04/2010 05:13:08 PM
- 1294 Views
I was originally gonna reply to your previous post, then decided not to. Guess I will now.
26/04/2010 05:42:15 PM
- 1138 Views
Well, when my sleeping is screwed up, interpretations are going to be wonky, it seems
27/04/2010 06:21:57 PM
- 1063 Views
One point...
26/04/2010 07:34:02 PM
- 986 Views
Posting while irritated and about to crash does little good, it seems
27/04/2010 06:20:19 PM
- 1062 Views
The delay to the review is my fault. I've got a mostly finished one. I'm just not happy with it.
27/04/2010 07:19:35 PM
- 1034 Views
It wasn't the review I was irritated about, but thanks for doing it
27/04/2010 07:39:08 PM
- 933 Views
I'm a bit ambivalent on the merits of this approach of yours.
26/04/2010 05:32:19 PM
- 927 Views
I am mostly just trying the approach out as something a little bit different.
26/04/2010 07:23:12 PM
- 1042 Views
Re: So what do you think about any of those things?
23/04/2010 08:30:55 PM
- 955 Views
I've posted my thoughts on most of those issues in various places in this discussion.
24/04/2010 05:02:44 AM
- 1122 Views
Re: I think I'd just like for you to be more proactive and Start A Thread.
24/04/2010 09:50:26 AM
- 1044 Views
A question about Lem.
23/04/2010 03:49:57 AM
- 1014 Views
My main thoughts on Solaris by Stanislaw Lem
23/04/2010 02:50:10 AM
- 1323 Views
I finally watched Avatar for the first time tonight.
25/04/2010 04:27:34 AM
- 943 Views
Re: I finally watched Avatar for the first time tonight.
25/04/2010 01:52:19 PM
- 991 Views
It had more to do with recognizing mankind's tendency to imposes their ideas on other cultures.
25/04/2010 05:35:25 PM
- 1033 Views
On identity and communication: do we love only ourselves?
25/04/2010 03:35:34 PM
- 992 Views
I did spend a lot of the book speculating on what the planet was trying to do with those supressed
25/04/2010 05:05:38 PM
- 1070 Views
The argument: (From the text and some thoughts)
27/04/2010 06:22:34 PM
- 926 Views
It is interesting you should say that.
12/05/2010 09:56:26 PM
- 1214 Views
That is the second time this week that I have heard something about Derrida. Now I am going to have
13/05/2010 12:02:56 AM
- 1071 Views
Is Solaris alive? Is Solaris sentient?
25/04/2010 03:40:57 PM
- 965 Views
I can't decide.
25/04/2010 03:54:39 PM
- 1112 Views
An interesting point to consider...
25/04/2010 10:41:17 PM
- 1114 Views
What do you think the biggest message of the book is?
25/04/2010 03:47:03 PM
- 1027 Views
Re: Does he let go of her? How independant is she of him?
25/04/2010 04:07:33 PM
- 1069 Views
Did anyone else do any wondering what their own visitors would take the form of if they were there?
26/04/2010 11:31:27 PM
- 951 Views
Re: You know, the more I think about it, the more surprised I am everyone only seemed to have one.
10/05/2010 10:08:23 PM
- 1006 Views