Active Users:1193 Time:22/11/2024 09:38:29 PM
That was most of my issue. Chas Send a noteboard - 21/04/2010 12:12:56 AM
Larry didn't call it an environmental novel (ie save the planet type thing)- he called it an ecological novel. Therein lies the confusion.
Reply to message
Frank Herbert, Dune Chronicles (series reviews within) - 16/04/2010 04:11:40 AM 1858 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 16/04/2010 06:09:49 PM 999 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 17/04/2010 12:08:06 AM 1170 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 17/04/2010 02:33:38 PM 1103 Views
I was using a fairly precise term when I said "ecological" - 18/04/2010 12:13:14 AM 1095 Views
Re: I was using a fairly precise term when I said "ecological" - 18/04/2010 03:34:33 AM 1142 Views
Please read linked interview...as I call bullshit. Also, why are your walls white? - 18/04/2010 05:18:07 AM 958 Views
Re: Please read linked interview...as I call bullshit. Also, why are your walls white? - 19/04/2010 06:15:26 PM 984 Views
That was most of my issue. - 21/04/2010 12:12:56 AM 855 Views
Re: That was most of my issue. - 21/04/2010 06:33:14 PM 834 Views
Re: That was most of my issue. - 29/04/2010 11:38:26 PM 811 Views
Just because something plays a dominate role doesn't make it a theme - 21/04/2010 02:09:42 PM 951 Views
A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present - 21/04/2010 11:21:38 PM 913 Views
Re: A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present - 22/04/2010 04:58:01 AM 862 Views
Good points - 22/04/2010 09:19:45 PM 895 Views
Re: Good points - 22/04/2010 10:55:21 PM 854 Views
when you call it human ecology I come much closer to agreeing - 22/04/2010 02:16:58 PM 874 Views
Not really sure how Larry's definition is archaic. - 19/04/2010 07:52:27 PM 980 Views
Re: Not really sure how Larry's definition is archaic. - 20/04/2010 07:04:40 PM 830 Views
You're not using "archaic" correctly - 20/04/2010 10:07:31 PM 851 Views
Your patronizing manner aside, that's not "archaic" at all. - 21/04/2010 01:46:50 AM 760 Views
doesn't that regulate the point down to interesting trivia? - 21/04/2010 02:36:38 PM 876 Views
Re: Your patronizing manner aside, that's not "archaic" at all. - 21/04/2010 06:23:24 PM 953 Views
Funny the things people focus on - 21/04/2010 11:24:59 PM 852 Views
Re: Funny the things people focus on - 23/04/2010 05:28:54 PM 855 Views
People who see this as an ecological book are missing the point of the book - 16/04/2010 06:28:40 PM 1338 Views
Books can have more than one theme. Great books almost always do. *NM* - 16/04/2010 07:15:11 PM 432 Views
I agree with that I just never really the ecological theme to Dune - 16/04/2010 10:12:26 PM 1046 Views
Ecology goes more than one way - 17/04/2010 12:12:45 AM 991 Views
There are several points to the book/series - 17/04/2010 12:11:38 AM 1064 Views
Everyone get something different from a book - 19/04/2010 07:01:51 PM 1249 Views
I remember having hated every single character of this book. Some random thoughts - 17/04/2010 05:08:25 PM 1193 Views
I hope you got to Darwi Odrade - 21/04/2010 03:44:27 PM 871 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 17/04/2010 08:05:16 PM 1435 Views
I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 17/04/2010 10:22:27 PM 1236 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 18/04/2010 04:38:10 AM 1161 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 19/04/2010 04:04:43 AM 1116 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 22/04/2010 04:31:26 AM 877 Views
I thought all of Dune had begun as a serial in a SF magazine. *NM* - 22/04/2010 01:58:22 PM 372 Views
And Dune Messiah as well was serialized at first, in Galaxy *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:31:54 PM 382 Views
Dune Messiah (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 19/04/2010 08:42:18 AM 1102 Views
Re: Dune Messiah (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 21/04/2010 03:33:46 PM 863 Views
I didn't see that in Alia - 21/04/2010 11:27:22 PM 771 Views
One of my favorite series! - 21/04/2010 03:30:57 PM 779 Views
I didn't "miss it" as much as I chose to deemphasize it - 21/04/2010 11:29:50 PM 703 Views
Re: I didn't "miss it" as much as I chose to deemphasize it - 22/04/2010 04:02:26 PM 816 Views
His style doesn't appeal to me as much, unfortunately - 22/04/2010 09:17:21 PM 702 Views
You might want to track down his short stories one day... - 23/04/2010 02:06:09 PM 928 Views
Children of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 22/04/2010 06:47:04 AM 910 Views
See...I think I made a mistake in my reading of Dune - 22/04/2010 07:26:28 AM 879 Views
Depends - 22/04/2010 08:01:39 AM 791 Views
Re: Depends - 22/04/2010 11:12:15 PM 1042 Views
read something else - 23/04/2010 07:49:34 PM 776 Views
LA Times article on Dune (4/18/2010) - 23/04/2010 10:59:00 AM 733 Views
God Emperor of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 25/04/2010 02:03:37 AM 998 Views
Heretics of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 28/04/2010 06:02:54 AM 752 Views
Re: Heretics of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 29/04/2010 03:26:28 PM 822 Views
I read the wiki synopses of those two books - 29/04/2010 09:44:07 PM 797 Views
Re: I read the wiki synopses of those two books - 10/05/2010 04:10:49 AM 1129 Views
Chapterhouse: Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 30/04/2010 02:31:10 PM 930 Views
Re: Chapterhouse: Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 10/05/2010 01:24:33 AM 959 Views

Reply to Message