Active Users:1221 Time:22/11/2024 03:48:45 PM

Search Form

Use the form below to select what you want to search for. If you enter text it will look for an exact match; leave it blank to search for all posts.

Search text:
Search through:
  • subject
  • body
Topic:
User:
Timeframe:
Showing 1 to 20 of 241 results Next >>
Subject Posted By Posted On Views No Message Locked
Showing 1 to 20 of 241 results Next >>
Re: That still would not make sense Onarishma 01/10/2015 11:54:06 PM 1098    
doubtful of that I think he can just still weave the Pattern, he is the Wyld Onarishma 28/02/2013 07:49:25 PM 377 Yes  
Luc = Perring = stopping Graendal and Lanfear. no DO = "turned" Elayne = no "choice" = no will Onarishma 22/01/2013 06:58:24 PM 1045    
Roderan certainly didnt get mentioned.... his men I dont know. Onarishma 13/01/2013 02:26:06 PM 496 Yes  
but they kept on fighting because they were following a false Wyld. Onarishma 13/01/2013 02:18:42 PM 825    
That's Wild.... Onarishma 13/01/2013 02:01:27 AM 1464    
rotflmao! Onarishma 13/01/2013 01:39:20 AM 270 Yes  
i was disappointed that it wasnt anyone remotely close to having a POV Onarishma 13/01/2013 01:33:02 AM 895    
Doesnt mean they are. Onarishma 09/01/2013 05:10:45 AM 244 Yes  
Re: Of course they're not the same... the first Herid's been under Rand nose for several weeks... Onarishma 09/01/2013 05:09:46 AM 640    
exactly lol! Onarishma 08/01/2013 10:33:43 AM 684    
did anyone else ever notice.... Onarishma 08/01/2013 12:41:24 AM 1007    
ditto! though he has been able to recognize others so why not Demandred Onarishma 23/12/2012 01:35:38 AM 583 Yes  
Day 24 - LTT/Rand Onarishma 23/12/2012 01:32:24 AM 810 Yes  
Onarishma 17/12/2012 11:22:55 PM 956    
I think the horn of Valere meshes the real world with TAR Onarishma 17/12/2012 03:13:46 PM 662    
lmao... shotgun! Onarishma 15/12/2012 07:37:35 PM 269 Yes  
I disagree with your plenty cause no one was TRYING to crush him. Onarishma 11/12/2012 07:13:12 PM 467 Yes  
in the context of this discussion you did not distinguish between the effective strength and Onarishma 11/12/2012 07:10:48 PM 710    
Re: *shrug* Onarishma 10/12/2012 11:27:42 PM 766