Active Users:365 Time:03/04/2025 03:08:19 AM
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
No, you really don't need to read it. Believe it or not I am trying very hard to enjoy the story, especially in light of the circumstances that lead me to the author. I want to like it. I really do, but so far it is garbage. This reads more like a second draft than a finished product. It is written in a form that I, generally speaking, do not like (1st person retrospective). However looking past the purely subjective viewpoint perspective it is not a plesant read. Nor, up to this point has it been very cohesive. The continuity errors ahve been rather glaring as well. This is only in the first 40 pages.

As for my sarcasm, I'm really not trying very hard to be sarcastic. Actually, I am making a bit of an effort in the opposite direction.

If I had come accross this book in any other circumstance, I would not continue reading it. This could well rival The Invisible Man for last place in my literary pantheon. I tore the pages out of that book as I read them to help preserve future generations.
Reply to message
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM 12430 Views
A question for Larry - 19/03/2010 09:40:37 PM 2917 Views
Roberto BolaƱo - 19/03/2010 11:09:57 PM 2727 Views
I completely agree with his review. - 19/03/2010 11:11:17 PM 2860 Views
Ouch! Somebody pull that guy off RJ! *NM* - 20/03/2010 03:47:07 AM 1420 Views
Can't say that I really disagree. - 20/03/2010 05:19:26 AM 2182 Views
My problem with the reviews: - 20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM 2843 Views
Hear Hear !!! ....................... = ........................ *NM* - 20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM 1361 Views
I agree - 20/03/2010 11:19:29 AM 2298 Views
You know what else I'm finding annoying? - 07/04/2010 07:29:37 AM 2233 Views
Fully Agree *NM* - 21/06/2010 12:41:05 AM 1244 Views
well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM 2594 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree - 20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM 2114 Views
I'd say just The Eye of the World - 20/03/2010 05:26:19 PM 2163 Views
Indeed - 21/03/2010 12:34:19 AM 2083 Views
These reviews are pathetic - 20/03/2010 12:52:22 PM 2096 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses - 20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM 2521 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/03/2010 10:48:14 PM 1574 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ? - 20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM 2261 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes - 20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM 2266 Views
I considered doing so - 21/03/2010 12:27:27 AM 2125 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ? - 21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM 2087 Views
My sister called me chicken once - 10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM 2133 Views
what's wrong runt... are you yellah? *NM* - 10/04/2010 10:40:16 AM 1323 Views
NICE! *NM* - 10/04/2010 02:19:44 PM 1186 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses - 23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM 2167 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM 2096 Views
Re: And I'm even more amused by this response - 24/03/2010 03:03:28 AM 1965 Views
Nah, TGS was the only serious review of the series I've done - 24/03/2010 04:31:28 AM 2061 Views
On a completely unrelated note... - 24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM 1968 Views
Ha! - 24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM 2009 Views
My congratulations then . *NM* - 24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM 1920 Views
You say it as if I had been condemned to hell! - 24/03/2010 07:13:45 AM 1826 Views
No. Well, maybe. - 24/03/2010 06:52:28 PM 2005 Views
! - 24/03/2010 06:54:34 PM 2015 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 22/03/2010 02:47:23 PM 2127 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 01:53:16 PM 2104 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series - 22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM 2148 Views
There's a point to it? - 22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM 2113 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM* - 24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM 1328 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you? - 24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM 2059 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place - 24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM 2041 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening? - 09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM 2104 Views
Re: Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT. - 23/03/2010 04:54:38 PM 2069 Views
pfft wth-ever - 26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM 1937 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM 2187 Views
bla bla bla - 29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM 2054 Views
Usually, it's spelled "blah" - 29/03/2010 07:03:51 AM 2032 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you *NM* - 29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM 1503 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM 1995 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment - 29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM 2130 Views
I know you were, thus the at the least of my comment - 29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM 1944 Views
Unimpressed - 29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM 2388 Views
Thank you - 30/03/2010 12:35:39 AM 1844 Views
*Standing ovation for DomA* - 30/03/2010 07:36:59 AM 2125 Views
Yes. Also, Roberts is a wanker. *NM* - 05/04/2010 09:28:57 PM 1333 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was - 29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM 2092 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again. - 29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM 1970 Views
Awards - 29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM 1930 Views
That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM 1921 Views
Re: That link is out of date - 29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM 2054 Views
This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM 1970 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose? - 29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM 2001 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM 1971 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense* - 29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM 2151 Views
The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM 1874 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense" - 30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM 1861 Views
No, no, no - 30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM 1916 Views
Re: No, no, no - 30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM 2042 Views
Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM 1983 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh? - 31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM 1949 Views
Those were polls - 31/03/2010 08:46:07 PM 1958 Views
Re: Those were polls - 05/04/2010 03:22:13 PM 1913 Views
Does it gives him right to insult me? - 13/04/2011 02:10:32 PM 1950 Views
I wouldn't know. Was he speaking directly to you? - 14/04/2011 11:28:16 PM 2052 Views
He's now reviewed the third book - 26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM 2175 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him . - 29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM 1909 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that - 29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM 1902 Views
Hah! - 29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM 1940 Views
Well... - 29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM 1833 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess. - 29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM 2010 Views
I suppose - 29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM 1932 Views
Re: I suppose - 30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM 2081 Views
True - 30/03/2010 12:23:28 AM 1914 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM 1879 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue? - 30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM 2040 Views
But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM 1965 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 03:56:54 PM 1918 Views
Re: But why only them? - 30/03/2010 08:29:37 PM 2035 Views
I really liked a lot of the minor characters in The Great Hunt. - 30/03/2010 12:49:03 AM 1952 Views
I barely thought twice about those, to be honest - 30/03/2010 06:39:55 PM 1975 Views
I can't wait what he's going to try to do with TFoH and beyond - 28/03/2010 08:18:59 PM 2065 Views
Glad you enjoyed it - 29/03/2010 09:33:43 PM 1877 Views
The Shadow Rising review - 02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM 2161 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling - 02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM 10721 Views
You want complaining? You got it... - 02/04/2010 06:38:09 PM 2046 Views
That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM 2168 Views
Re: That would be a mistake - 02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM 1926 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter - 10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM 2052 Views
Little late to this one as well - 10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM 2068 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit - 10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM 2133 Views
Re: I wonder if this borders on trolling - 04/04/2010 09:16:22 AM 2032 Views
What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM 2132 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one... - 02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM 2135 Views
See my comment below - 02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM 2187 Views
Re: See my comment below - 03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM 2548 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week - 07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM 2385 Views
Yes, I can probably agree with what you say here. - 08/04/2010 12:29:16 AM 1845 Views
- 08/04/2010 12:32:53 AM 1988 Views
I agree completely. *NM* - 02/04/2010 09:53:44 PM 1227 Views
Speaking of irritation - 02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM 2101 Views
Commentary, then? - 02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM 1979 Views
Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM 1918 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM 1771 Views
Re: Here's the thing... - 03/04/2010 01:34:05 AM 1828 Views
I somehow overlooked this last week, it seems - 10/04/2010 11:01:17 AM 2131 Views
Indeed - 02/04/2010 10:34:00 PM 1821 Views
Re: Commentary, then? - 05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM 1903 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work - 08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM 2107 Views
1400 words is long-winded? - 09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM 2144 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded - 09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM 2024 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit - 10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM 2049 Views
You are very defensive over this - 10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM 1866 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM 1908 Views
Re: Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else - 12/04/2010 05:30:53 PM 1833 Views
You sound like a Goodkind webmaster from a couple of years ago - 12/04/2010 06:58:42 PM 1930 Views
You don't come across as a devil's advocate - 30/03/2011 03:07:32 PM 1915 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM 2084 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM 1945 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM 1798 Views
Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM 2036 Views
Re: Which Invisible Man? - 09/04/2010 01:26:42 PM 1990 Views
I have a very different take on that book - 10/04/2010 11:17:13 AM 1873 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes! - 09/04/2010 01:45:44 PM 1953 Views
Hrmm... - 10/04/2010 11:19:01 AM 1791 Views
Re: Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts - 12/04/2010 05:37:36 PM 2020 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner - 08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM 1982 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM 1971 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM 2520 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much - 10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM 1984 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts? - 10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM 2005 Views
I don't understand it either - 11/04/2010 12:44:25 PM 1969 Views
right? - 11/04/2010 02:13:00 PM 2005 Views
Nah - 12/04/2010 04:13:44 AM 1796 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus - 09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM 1966 Views
5 reviews without saying more than "I hate the series" - 09/04/2010 01:31:13 PM 1813 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument... - 09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM 1863 Views
Well, what was really resolved here? - 10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM 1945 Views
Well... - 12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM 2027 Views
well exactly - 12/04/2010 05:33:11 PM 2091 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then? - 12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM 2022 Views
Yes... - 12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM 1768 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon? - 12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM 2089 Views
I guess... - 13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM 2084 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest - 13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM 3202 Views
Nah... - 13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM 1772 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others - 13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM 1857 Views
Ah, well... - 13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM 1802 Views
Dismissive, much? - 13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM 1985 Views
About that bifurcation... - 14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM 1930 Views
I'm rather moderate - 14/04/2010 10:11:30 AM 1844 Views
I'm just a liberation theologist at heart - 15/04/2010 01:51:16 PM 2771 Views
So, if you don't mind... - 13/04/2010 05:51:06 AM 1961 Views
That's fine with me - 13/04/2010 06:31:41 AM 1935 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS. - 09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM 1971 Views
I didn't find it quite that bad, but... - 11/04/2010 08:27:52 AM 1961 Views
LoC represented a sharp drop in quality!!? - 19/05/2010 03:27:21 PM 1965 Views
And ignores everything else... - 09/04/2010 05:10:00 PM 2014 Views
Inchoatus went offline a couple of years ago - 10/04/2010 11:42:26 AM 2907 Views
This guy is going to get what he deserves... - 09/04/2010 10:26:14 PM 1943 Views
I'm waiting with bated breath for his CoT review *NM* - 10/04/2010 01:00:59 PM 1297 Views
Just wanted to point out that he is not reviewing the series. - 16/04/2010 04:04:49 PM 1885 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary - 16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM 1932 Views
He has reached - The Hump. - 16/04/2010 03:55:51 PM 1895 Views
Re: He has reached - The Hump. - 18/04/2010 08:08:59 AM 2333 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven! - 16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM 1850 Views
Yeah, I noticed that - 16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM 1765 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind... - 16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM 1986 Views
Finally re-read that post - 20/04/2010 09:35:45 PM 1965 Views
The magic items are mostly irrelevant... - 21/04/2010 03:37:36 AM 1922 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM 2041 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn? - 29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM 1977 Views
I disagree - 29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM 1787 Views
I agree. - 29/04/2010 09:45:29 PM 2007 Views
Took me a moment to realize with whom you were agreeing - 29/04/2010 10:19:05 PM 1908 Views
Well, I did mention the necklines get overdone... - 06/05/2010 06:17:46 PM 2214 Views
Well, there's now also the tea to comment about - 07/05/2010 11:29:03 AM 2041 Views
A bit of a stumble this week - 30/04/2010 01:53:31 PM 2070 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary - 07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM 2106 Views
You'd think a Brit would like the tea... *NM* - 11/05/2010 04:05:42 PM 1163 Views
Maybe he's just a contrarian? - 11/05/2010 07:55:43 PM 1867 Views
Winter's Heart - 21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM 2083 Views
To be fair - 21/05/2010 01:56:49 PM 2204 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM 1947 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read - 25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM 2097 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot. - 28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM 1958 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote: - 28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM 2270 Views
CoT, you mean (link to actual post included) - 28/05/2010 04:56:10 PM 2098 Views
Yep, I meant COT. *NM* - 28/05/2010 07:02:48 PM 1168 Views
Knife of Dreams - 18/06/2010 09:07:27 AM 1973 Views
Re: Knife of Dreams - 19/06/2010 05:49:38 AM 2055 Views
Agree... - 19/06/2010 05:08:44 PM 1989 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him - 25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM 2050 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake - 25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM 9495 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark? - 26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM 1964 Views
Oh come on... - 26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM 2074 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much... - 26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM 2064 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice... - 26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM 2071 Views
And your point is...? - 27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM 2071 Views
Well... - 27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM 2038 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble - 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM 2205 Views
There is no "borderline" about it. - 28/03/2011 05:17:15 PM 1902 Views
Ridiculous - 27/06/2010 06:38:46 AM 1976 Views
I like his FAQ and his overall musings on its' popularity. - 29/06/2010 06:35:10 PM 1967 Views
One year later... - 27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM 1903 Views
Re: One year later... - 28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM 2143 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes. - 28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM 2145 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM* - 30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM 1231 Views
Jealous? - 30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM 1905 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM 1151 Views
Seconded. - 30/03/2011 04:04:36 PM 1853 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM* - 30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM 1277 Views
Yep! - 30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM 1851 Views
Jeez Larry, you're starting to sound like a GRRM detractor. - 31/03/2011 03:01:38 PM 2034 Views
Nah, no detractor - 01/04/2011 03:00:41 PM 2024 Views
Could a thread be locked? - 31/03/2011 07:48:26 PM 1892 Views
Re: One year later... - 01/04/2011 02:55:02 AM 2265 Views
Yep - 01/04/2011 02:57:52 PM 2032 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM* - 30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM 1162 Views

Reply to Message