Active Users:499 Time:10/11/2024 09:04:40 PM
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM
someone would have had to send him ... which we cannot know prior to the events of LOC is part of how things work with Slayer. His involvement adds another layer to the mystery

such as:

1. how would anyone know where to find Asmo in the first place? The crime is way too opportunistic for to have been planned out.

2. why would any of the FS bother to send Slayer after Asmo? There is no gain in it for them to kill him off via the use of Slayer. Sure seeing him dead would be good for them, but ultimately it seems like a lot of work just to kill him off.

3. RJ foreshadowed it being one of the FS earlier in the book when Asmo tells Rand that any of the FS "would kill him on sight"

Slayer as the killer feels like a red herring to me ... seems obvious at first, but once you do even the smallest digging the whole house of cards collapses.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 1790 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 558 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 577 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 575 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 444 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 596 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 513 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 210 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 353 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 406 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 445 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 446 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 424 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 433 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 422 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 409 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 416 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 433 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 400 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 451 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 456 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 427 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 413 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 440 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 444 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 403 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 416 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 452 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 396 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 436 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 399 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 440 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 213 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 479 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 412 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 380 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 369 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 495 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 203 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 412 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 411 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 394 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 439 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 400 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 498 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 415 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 395 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 215 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 400 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 349 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 368 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 382 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 364 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 376 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 376 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 397 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 373 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 361 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 447 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 348 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 383 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 368 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 372 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 175 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 374 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 174 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 375 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 386 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 423 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 191 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 166 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 397 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 372 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 422 Views

Reply to Message