Active Users:553 Time:05/04/2025 07:38:39 AM
exactly saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 31/03/2010 01:12:59 AM
true. However, in my best recollection, RJ was always very careful in his his reference to the culprit to avoid unintended clues. If you are right, given the volume of Q&A on Asmo, there should be other instances where RJ said "he", and/or if those instances demonstrate the reference was not a hint--if he says "he" but also refuses to give a clue. the contradiction would IMO demonstrate the "he" had no meaning.
Reply to message
A second RJ slip up as to Asmo's killer? - 31/03/2010 12:31:52 AM 1350 Views
He said, "he", because Slayer is a boy (has a pee pee). *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:06:04 AM 217 Views
c'mon - 31/03/2010 01:39:46 AM 600 Views
Ishamael went to the darkside because - 31/03/2010 01:06:14 AM 725 Views
exactly - 31/03/2010 01:12:59 AM 590 Views
That's actually proper English. - 31/03/2010 03:07:05 AM 1098 Views
Re: That's actually proper English. - 31/03/2010 03:44:49 AM 805 Views
Moot - 31/03/2010 05:25:59 AM 555 Views
Re: That's actually proper English. - 31/03/2010 01:12:03 PM 830 Views
Well... - 31/03/2010 01:57:44 PM 540 Views
I brought this up before, and I think RJ slipped here. *NM* - 31/03/2010 09:20:07 AM 194 Views
This is nothing. - 31/03/2010 02:37:28 PM 561 Views
You're assuming - 31/03/2010 04:13:20 PM 515 Views
Re: You're assuming - 31/03/2010 04:35:35 PM 485 Views
Re: A second RJ slip up as to Asmo's killer? - 31/03/2010 06:34:48 PM 566 Views
Re: A second RJ slip up as to Asmo's killer? - 31/03/2010 07:01:14 PM 510 Views

Reply to Message