Active Users:474 Time:22/12/2024 06:44:06 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
There is no reason to believe there was no trace of the body. Narg Send a noteboard - 24/03/2010 06:48:56 PM
Just because the body was clearly gotten rid of in one way or another does not mean that no trace of the body was left behind. There could have been blood on the floor, etc, while the body itself was removed.

Who knows what traces were left? When the servants cleaned up the palace it is quite possible that they would have cleaned up any mess without making a big deal of it.
A little learning is a dangerous thing.
Reply to message
Asmodean Kieran - 22/03/2010 11:53:47 PM 7717 Views
There is no reason to assume Yondaime - 23/03/2010 12:10:50 AM 954 Views
Re: There is no reason to assume Kieran - 23/03/2010 01:23:46 AM 834 Views
Re: Asmodean DomA - 23/03/2010 03:51:38 AM 979 Views
Another thought Froggles - 23/03/2010 04:49:55 AM 785 Views
Re: Another thought Kieran - 23/03/2010 05:12:59 AM 765 Views
Re: Another thought Isaac - 23/03/2010 07:10:53 AM 951 Views
Re: Another thought DomA - 23/03/2010 09:15:05 PM 910 Views
because nigelgoboom - 23/03/2010 05:12:57 AM 789 Views
There is no reason to believe there was no trace of the body. Narg - 24/03/2010 06:48:56 PM 806 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes