Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
mogi67 Send a noteboard - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
I understand what you're saying (I think), but I would word it differently.
Ishamael's beliefs are, by our definition, evil.
Therefore, Ishamael is, by our definition, evil.
But, Ishamael doesn't believe he is evil, nor does he believe the DO is evil, nor does he believe in evil. He simply believes what he believes, and doesn't care about any arbitrary label of that belief as Good or Evil.
Ishamael's beliefs are, by our definition, evil.
Therefore, Ishamael is, by our definition, evil.
But, Ishamael doesn't believe he is evil, nor does he believe the DO is evil, nor does he believe in evil. He simply believes what he believes, and doesn't care about any arbitrary label of that belief as Good or Evil.
So you're suggesting that Nihilists are evil?
Ishamael's nature
01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM
- 1762 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM
- 801 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees.
01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM
- 864 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ...
02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM
- 632 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM
- 655 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics?
02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM
- 552 Views
Crap
02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM
- 609 Views
That high IQ should make you realise that I am making the same point you are...
02/03/2010 09:53:59 PM
- 567 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM
- 567 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
02/03/2010 06:01:41 PM
- 575 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil
07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM
- 517 Views
I doubt that.
08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM
- 490 Views
Re: Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking...
02/03/2010 07:22:58 PM
- 539 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM
- 608 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM
- 548 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature
02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM
- 529 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland
02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM
- 875 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM
- 537 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least...
08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM
- 482 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 482 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern.
09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM
- 466 Views
Because there is a Creator.
09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM
- 459 Views
faulty assumptions
10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 465 Views
Impossible.
10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM
- 460 Views
maybe an analogy will help
10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM
- 878 Views

But therein lies the problem.
10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM
- 459 Views
your own argument is self defeating
11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM
- 486 Views
No, that past was created after he was imprisoned.
11/03/2010 05:43:08 PM
- 488 Views
*sigh* I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then.... I still think your theory is flawed *NM*
12/03/2010 05:11:10 AM
- 221 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory
11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM
- 466 Views