Active Users:139 Time:17/04/2025 02:02:24 AM
Both of us are saying the same thing car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM
What I meant by "could not completely rid the world of evil" was that even if 'dark' Rand beat the Dark One, the world would still not be free of evil. Why would the Seanchan victory be bad? Because they are evil (or at least oppressive). Similarly Rand would cause so much turmoil and sacrifice so much, break the world to a million peices, all for the one goal of fighting the Dark One, that winning would be as bad as losing

Thank goodness he went to Dragonmount and had a major flashback...
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1762 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 786 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 261 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 801 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 632 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 654 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 552 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 616 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 609 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 534 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 508 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 479 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 477 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 566 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 516 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 671 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 490 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 474 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 568 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 555 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 608 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 548 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 528 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 493 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 476 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 875 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 545 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 537 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 537 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 482 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 481 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 466 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 459 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 465 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 460 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 878 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 459 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 486 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 465 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 216 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 206 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 545 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 611 Views

Reply to Message