Active Users:141 Time:17/04/2025 02:02:30 AM
Maybe Sidious Send a noteboard - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM
If so, I disagree with you. If you have them all write IQ tests I'm pretty sure that the quantum physicists, theoretical mathematicians etc will trump the philosophers and theologians.


IQ tests are notoriously unreliable measures of human intelligence. Still, I understand what you are saying. There are many types of intelligence. Mathematicians could work out equations that philosphers could never dream of doing.

However, I do think Ishamael is the most intelligent man in the series. He could see things no one else could, which is ultimately why he was caught up in a web of complex thoughts and was killed by a relatively uneducated farmer.

Ishamael's theories on the Dragon and other aspects of the Wheel of Time are often referred to by the other Forsaken. The only other Forsaken who is referred to for academic reasons by other Forsaken is Graendal - who is also renowned for her almost unique intelligence. It's remarkable that RJ said that Lews Therin's IQ was close to 200, and yet LTT thinks that he could never outfox Graendal.

The Forsaken's inability to comprehend what Ishamael was saying has been as close as we've ever seen to Forsaken admitting fallability. Despite his failures he's remained the DO's top servant, which signifies to me that he really does understand that DO and the Creator better than any other person alive.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1762 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 786 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 261 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 801 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 632 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 655 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 552 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 617 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 609 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 534 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 508 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 479 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 477 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 567 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 517 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 672 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 490 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 474 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 569 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 555 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 608 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 549 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 529 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 493 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 476 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 875 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 545 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 538 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 537 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 482 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 482 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 466 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 459 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 465 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 460 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 878 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 459 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 486 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 466 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 217 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 206 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 545 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 611 Views

Reply to Message