Active Users:139 Time:17/04/2025 02:02:33 AM
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM

TGS (A Place to Begin) - "Is that what made you turn to his side?" Rand asked. "You were always so full of thoughts, Elan. Your logic destroyed you, didn't it?"

Was anyone struck by this statement?

I've always thought this was what snared Ishamael, and to see it written in plain text was striking to me. Ishamael is so intelligent and thinks everything through so deeply, that he arrives at conclusions that seem illogical. It's like someone who becomes hysterical when presented with 1+1, insisting that it's 2 instantly, whereas a brilliant mathematician has alternate theories.

In this same way, we all automatically know that the DO is evil, but Elan got caught up in complex philosophy. He's still caught up in it.

It's an interesting statement, and personifies Ishamael for me.


Is Ishamael really more intelligent than Aginor - the genius mad scientist? Or Graendal, the foremost psychologist in the world? Or Demandred, the man who has an IQ of 160 compared to Lews Therin's 170, according to RJ?

I don't necessarily think so. Ishamael is different because he is a theologian and philosopher. He looks at the world with different eyes and from a different perspective than the other super intelligent members of the Forsaken. This doesn't mean that he is smarter than them. It just means that his area of expertise happens to be most suitable to understanding the Dark One.

Aginor's specialist area is biology. Graendal's is psychology. Demandred's is leadership, military strategy and politics.

Ishamael's is the study of good and evil. Exactly what is needed to understand the Dark One. He may not understand biology as well as Aginor, the human mind as well as Graendal, political and military strategy as well as Demandred. But he understands the nature of good and evil better than anyone.

That's all.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 05:27:48 PM 1762 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 01/03/2010 07:15:54 PM 786 Views
Sisyphus *NM* - 02/03/2010 02:27:06 AM 261 Views
Not a question of intelligence. Rather, a different way of thinking... - 01/03/2010 07:23:37 PM 801 Views
I'd go with this - he lost sight of the forest for enumerating the trees. - 01/03/2010 08:21:39 PM 865 Views
I agree, except with your statement on what Ishamael's area of expertise is ... - 02/03/2010 03:17:13 PM 632 Views
Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 04:38:06 PM 655 Views
Are you saying that philosophers are inherently more intelligent than other academics? - 02/03/2010 04:53:13 PM 552 Views
Maybe - 02/03/2010 06:00:20 PM 617 Views
Crap - 02/03/2010 08:58:12 PM 609 Views
I think the averages are averages. - 03/03/2010 01:14:41 AM 534 Views
Re: Crap - 05/03/2010 08:46:56 PM 508 Views
Re: Crap - 07/03/2010 11:36:16 PM 479 Views
I love IQ tests. - 08/03/2010 01:18:10 AM 478 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 02/03/2010 05:30:43 PM 567 Views
Re: Which makes him the most evil of the Forsaken... or the least evil - 07/03/2010 11:31:14 PM 517 Views
I'm not an expert on nihilism, but ... - 08/03/2010 05:22:33 PM 672 Views
I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 01:21:32 AM 490 Views
Re: I doubt that. - 08/03/2010 12:41:43 PM 474 Views
Yep, I agree. - 08/03/2010 05:58:03 PM 569 Views
This ties in with his parallel to Lucifer. - 03/03/2010 12:57:37 AM 555 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 01:49:19 AM 608 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 02:51:44 PM 549 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 07:31:32 PM 529 Views
Both of us are saying the same thing - 03/03/2010 01:46:57 PM 493 Views
sorry, took "evil" too literally and - 03/03/2010 07:02:01 PM 477 Views
Found a great theory about Ishamael and his logic on theoryland - 02/03/2010 02:48:02 PM 875 Views
Nice - 02/03/2010 04:41:05 PM 545 Views
Impressive - 02/03/2010 07:24:09 PM 538 Views
I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 01:47:47 AM 537 Views
Re: I have to disagree on one thing, at the very least... - 08/03/2010 12:37:27 PM 482 Views
Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 08/03/2010 06:23:19 PM 482 Views
Re: Yes, but Shai'tan himself is outside the Pattern. - 09/03/2010 01:54:26 PM 466 Views
Because there is a Creator. - 09/03/2010 05:57:16 PM 459 Views
faulty assumptions - 10/03/2010 05:05:23 AM 465 Views
Impossible. - 10/03/2010 06:22:43 AM 460 Views
maybe an analogy will help - 10/03/2010 12:55:37 PM 878 Views
But therein lies the problem. - 10/03/2010 04:58:42 PM 459 Views
your own argument is self defeating - 11/03/2010 08:10:36 AM 486 Views
Anyway I just realized this point is irrelevant to the original theory - 11/03/2010 08:14:20 AM 466 Views
Yes, I said that at the very beginning: *NM* - 11/03/2010 05:44:19 PM 217 Views
Your reasons and mine for irrelevancy are different.. *NM* - 12/03/2010 05:12:52 AM 206 Views
Re: Ishamael's nature - 02/03/2010 10:43:16 PM 545 Views
I don't know if this has any basis in fact... - 04/03/2010 02:44:26 AM 611 Views

Reply to Message