Active Users:248 Time:10/04/2025 05:57:18 AM
Re: A better questions is why didn't previous False Dragons do it Datakim Send a noteboard - 26/02/2010 12:33:01 AM
I mean, Rand had his own reasons for going there- and none of those reasons were "piss off Far Madding, or make it easier to invade."

But if one of the infamous False Dragons of history had wanted to take Far madding, they totally could have. Ah, well...


Perhaps none of them wanted the city bad enough. I don't think it has that much influence in the world. The only thing that makes it special is the guardian. It's destruction would remove the citys only claim to fame.

Rand actually has a real reason to take the effort to destroy the guardian. The borderlander leaders are in the city and he cannot meet with them without significant risk to his life (and by extension the world) unless he disables the thing.

The false dragons were probably more interested in conquering major cities like Caemlyn or Tear. But you are right, they COULD have taken FM if they had really wanted to.
Reply to message
Far Madding and the borderlanders. An easy solution. - 24/02/2010 05:52:40 PM 1061 Views
Re: Far Madding and the borderlanders. An easy solution. - 24/02/2010 07:46:55 PM 708 Views
Re: Far Madding and the borderlanders. An easy solution. - 26/02/2010 12:14:56 AM 588 Views
Any solution that wrecks Far Madding is fine with me. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:55:06 AM 200 Views
It depends on what you consider to be "the problem" - 25/02/2010 05:24:33 PM 580 Views
A better questions is why didn't previous False Dragons do it - 25/02/2010 06:19:59 PM 540 Views
Re: A better questions is why didn't previous False Dragons do it - 26/02/2010 12:33:01 AM 501 Views
One of them did - 26/02/2010 05:16:49 AM 544 Views
Yes, there's definitely time for Elayne and Egwene to both be captured at least once - 26/02/2010 04:28:18 PM 479 Views
Re: It depends on what you consider to be "the problem" - 26/02/2010 12:29:03 AM 576 Views

Reply to Message