I really believe that this would have been the ideal thing to do. There will probably be a compromise of some sorts in the next two books, but to cripple the Seanchan would have made sense and been my action if I was Rand.
Very true. Rand originally intended to destroy the palace and the ships with balefire, then rain fire on the whole city causing panic and mass death. He chose not to go through with his attack, because the people in Ebou Dar showed him compassion when he got sick. He was unable to hurt them.
My question would be, why the heck was he planning on attacking the city itself in the first place? How does that make any sense? I mean all he would have had to do is wipe out the leadership and major military installations. There was never any need for him to hurt a single non-combatant.
He could have taken out only Tuon, disrupting the Seanchan leadership. Destroyed all the ships which would have freed the Sea Folk to ferry food freely and quickly. And struck major and decisive blows to the army itself, demonstrating the ability to crush the Seanchan and forcing them back to the negotiation table.
I never understood why attacking the mostly civilian capital was even an option. Another sign of Rand being crazy lunatic at that point I guess.
Will Rand bow to the Crystal Throne?
- 16/02/2010 07:03:12 PM
2264 Views
I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS.
- 16/02/2010 08:24:20 PM
1275 Views
So you think him submitting to the Seanchan is a good thing?
- 17/02/2010 07:25:13 PM
1267 Views
It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
- 17/02/2010 11:03:22 PM
1110 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
- 17/02/2010 11:41:11 PM
1029 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
- 18/02/2010 03:23:39 AM
987 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
- 18/02/2010 03:38:04 AM
1076 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
- 19/02/2010 03:18:35 PM
1135 Views
Re: I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS.
- 18/02/2010 07:18:44 AM
1016 Views
Re: I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS.
- 18/02/2010 01:22:49 PM
1019 Views
Why everyone's loving Seanchan?
- 18/02/2010 02:41:07 PM
1004 Views
- 18/02/2010 02:41:07 PM
1004 Views
As I said - all of Randland's political systems have strengths and weaknesses.
- 18/02/2010 05:46:40 PM
897 Views
I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else.
- 19/02/2010 03:23:22 PM
1031 Views
Re: I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else.
- 19/02/2010 06:13:08 PM
958 Views
Re: I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else.
- 19/02/2010 07:37:25 PM
1066 Views
the entire system of Seekers isn't an abuse of power? Bethamin winds up fleeing due to her fear of
- 20/02/2010 12:13:52 AM
1068 Views
No, they're the only group that seems to pay more than lip service to the concept of responsibility
- 20/02/2010 03:37:58 PM
976 Views
You asked for an example of abuse of power. The Seekers are a clear abuse no better than any
- 20/02/2010 04:42:06 PM
1338 Views
Thanks for the perspective of outsiders and the behavior of a Darkfriend. THAT's good info!
- 24/02/2010 01:26:39 PM
1252 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan?
- 19/02/2010 04:27:13 PM
921 Views
- 19/02/2010 04:27:13 PM
921 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan?
- 19/02/2010 05:41:53 PM
1145 Views
- 19/02/2010 05:41:53 PM
1145 Views
