Active Users:1117 Time:24/02/2025 05:01:55 AM
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan? Datakim Send a noteboard - 19/02/2010 05:41:53 PM

I really believe that this would have been the ideal thing to do. There will probably be a compromise of some sorts in the next two books, but to cripple the Seanchan would have made sense and been my action if I was Rand.


Very true. Rand originally intended to destroy the palace and the ships with balefire, then rain fire on the whole city causing panic and mass death. He chose not to go through with his attack, because the people in Ebou Dar showed him compassion when he got sick. He was unable to hurt them.

My question would be, why the heck was he planning on attacking the city itself in the first place? How does that make any sense? I mean all he would have had to do is wipe out the leadership and major military installations. There was never any need for him to hurt a single non-combatant.

He could have taken out only Tuon, disrupting the Seanchan leadership. Destroyed all the ships which would have freed the Sea Folk to ferry food freely and quickly. And struck major and decisive blows to the army itself, demonstrating the ability to crush the Seanchan and forcing them back to the negotiation table.

I never understood why attacking the mostly civilian capital was even an option. Another sign of Rand being crazy lunatic at that point I guess.
Reply to message
Will Rand bow to the Crystal Throne? - 16/02/2010 07:03:12 PM 2112 Views
Re: Will Rand bow to the Crystal Throne? - 16/02/2010 07:07:51 PM 1167 Views
Like I said below.... - 16/02/2010 07:33:59 PM 952 Views
I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS. - 16/02/2010 08:24:20 PM 1131 Views
Yeah, Rand doesn't have many options left - 16/02/2010 09:13:26 PM 861 Views
Ignore this ... double post.... - 16/02/2010 09:13:35 PM 794 Views
So you think him submitting to the Seanchan is a good thing? - 17/02/2010 07:25:13 PM 1035 Views
It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will. - 17/02/2010 11:03:22 PM 926 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will. - 17/02/2010 11:41:11 PM 871 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will. - 18/02/2010 03:23:39 AM 821 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will. - 18/02/2010 03:38:04 AM 910 Views
Perhaps if they reform, other rulers will accept them. - 18/02/2010 05:59:16 AM 889 Views
Re: I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS. - 18/02/2010 07:18:44 AM 857 Views
Why everyone's loving Seanchan? - 18/02/2010 02:41:07 PM 844 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan? - 19/02/2010 07:48:07 AM 881 Views
I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else. - 19/02/2010 03:23:22 PM 873 Views
the entire system of Seekers isn't an abuse of power? Bethamin winds up fleeing due to her fear of - 20/02/2010 12:13:52 AM 902 Views
Agree - 20/02/2010 01:04:26 AM 930 Views
Re: Agree - 20/02/2010 03:46:03 PM 842 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan? - 19/02/2010 04:27:13 PM 761 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan? - 19/02/2010 05:41:08 PM 789 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan? - 19/02/2010 05:41:53 PM 927 Views
Re: Will Rand bow to the Crystal Throne? - 16/02/2010 09:51:36 PM 979 Views
I think it's a false prophecy - 17/02/2010 12:39:23 AM 953 Views
"Bow, or be bowed." *NM* - 18/02/2010 03:39:04 PM 522 Views
Submit to Fortuona - 02/03/2010 10:02:31 AM 776 Views
Just A Possibility - 02/03/2010 09:52:20 PM 803 Views

Reply to Message