Active Users:564 Time:19/12/2024 03:26:18 PM
I didn't get that at all NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 03/09/2009 12:04:57 PM
To me, the post reads like he can forsee potential delays even though he doesn't say so outright--from what I remember, we didn't get a similar post about TGS potentially taking longer than expected.

It's funny how two different people can read the same piece and come away with completely different viewpoints. I interpreted that blog post to mean that things are going pretty good, he feels refreshed etc etc but as in any long term project stuff can happen to cause setbacks. This is always the case with EVERY long term project, witness the CERN collider. I think he put that in to remind us of that. I think it will be super cool if he gets AMoLII out by Jan, giving us a year between books but to be truthful I've been more expecting 18 months between the books.

NaCl(in the end, after everything is said and done, lots more has been said than done)H2O
Reply to message
New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 11:49:10 AM 1085 Views
Some good info there - 03/09/2009 12:03:14 PM 570 Views
I didn't get that at all - 03/09/2009 12:04:57 PM 606 Views
Re: I didn't get that at all - 03/09/2009 12:12:04 PM 566 Views
Re: I didn't get that at all - 03/09/2009 02:21:01 PM 521 Views
Another curious thing - 03/09/2009 01:05:35 PM 644 Views
Nothing curious there. - 03/09/2009 02:46:23 PM 535 Views
Aha. So I was, in fact, misremembering. Thanks! - 03/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 521 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 01:36:07 PM 534 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 02:09:27 PM 516 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 02:20:44 PM 565 Views
Some people have been speculating that it is Lan... - 03/09/2009 07:11:19 PM 531 Views
Come what may - 03/09/2009 07:20:41 PM 489 Views
Re: Some people have been speculating that it is Lan... - 03/09/2009 08:49:52 PM 476 Views
Re: New blog post on Book 13 - 03/09/2009 08:34:54 PM 637 Views

Reply to Message