Active Users:1126 Time:22/11/2024 04:19:00 PM
Also would explain the question of why Moiraine left the angreal on the wagon instead of using it... Shannow Send a noteboard - 21/01/2010 02:30:46 PM
2. I don't believe the Finns transferred the power from Lanfear to Moiraine. I believe it had something to do with both of them channeling through the same angreal when they went through the doorway.


Have we any clue that such a exchange in the theoretical OP strength between two channelers could happen?

I mean, we know that channelers can in the worst case burn out, if they mess with *angreal. Therefore I can buy that maybe Moiraine burned out and Lanfear was at least temporarily unable to channel, as a side-effect of falling with another channeler through a melting ter'angreal while both were using an angreal. It also makes sense that Moiraine actually wanted to achieve that, because otherwise Lanfear could likely simply return to Randland and attack Rand again.

But it seems pretty crazy to me that this incident could somehow lead to Lanfear (why not Moiraine?) losing an - apparently completely random - amount of her possible OP strength and Moiraine (why not Lanfear?) gaining this potential, especially since according to BS the OP strength is tied to the respective body of a channeler (or do you think that Lanfear and Moiraine changed bodies?). That such a thing could happen and would even have an important plot relevance seems like a complete deus ex machina explanation.

Another problem is then the question, how the Finn can hold Moiraine, if she is such a strong channeler now (though I suppose one could also explain it with some super ter'angreal they have).

Finally, in her last PoV in TFoH, ch.53, Moiraine suppresses "a small bubble of hope", before she attacks Lanfear. As we learn from her letter in KoD, Moiraine definitely knew that she would survive this, but would be captured by the Finn with the good possibility that Thom & Co. will successfully rescue her. Therefore I think the small bubble of hope Moiraine suppresses most likely means that she hopes against all odds that she won't burn out, though she is very certain that this will happen.


Well clearly what happened to Lanfear is a unique thing, because all of the Forsaken discount Cyndane being Lanfear based on her OP strength. We also know that Forsaken were occasionally resurrected in the War of Power, so a reduction in strength is unheard of. IMO two women falling through a ter'angreal while holding saidar could yield a wierd result.


Why did Moiraine arrange for Lanfear to get the angreal? Surely if she had USED the angreal herself, instead, then Moiraine with an angreal, plus Aviendha plus Egwene plus Rand with his angreal would have been more than powerful enough to defeat Lanfear on her own.

Instead, Moiraine had a purpose for the angreal, which involved Lanfear using it. It is a purpose beyond just getting Lanfear to climb onto the wagon, because if Moiraine on her own could balefire Be'lal, then Moiraine with that angreal could have easily balefired Lanfear. Especially if Moiraine was expecting the confrontation at the Docks.

No, I think Moiraine knew Lanfear had to have the angreal, in order for OTHER benefits to take place, BEYOND the doorway. Benefits like the exchange of power if they both channeled through the angreal as they went through.

I think this is part of what Moiraine learned in her viewings of the future. Because otherwise there is no conceivable reason why Moiraine would let Lanfear get access to the angreal, rather than using it herself to aid Rand in the battle.
Reply to message
My Lanfear/Cyndane theory has been disproven. - 20/01/2010 05:12:58 PM 2766 Views
It was discussed - 20/01/2010 05:27:43 PM 1113 Views
Re: It was discussed - 20/01/2010 07:09:01 PM 897 Views
Maybe... - 20/01/2010 07:15:57 PM 832 Views
Re: Maybe... - 20/01/2010 08:53:47 PM 881 Views
Yeah, that would be a possibility! *NM* - 20/01/2010 09:01:26 PM 805 Views
That doesn't really jive with Aran'gar though - 20/01/2010 09:03:35 PM 826 Views
But... - 20/01/2010 09:11:47 PM 803 Views
I think it's pretty obvious that pretty much any man is going to be - 20/01/2010 09:41:40 PM 759 Views
The idea behind this theory is... - 21/01/2010 07:15:19 AM 938 Views
Maybe there is a difference between male souls and female souls ... - 20/01/2010 09:35:57 PM 828 Views
Plausible - 20/01/2010 09:45:21 PM 919 Views
Actually, I didn't mean to imply that my idea of female strength is related to body size ... - 20/01/2010 10:10:48 PM 807 Views
LOL ... I hear ya on that - 20/01/2010 10:17:02 PM 879 Views
I'm so pleased this theory is false! - 12/12/2010 05:00:06 PM 738 Views
people didn't like it when I proposed it - 20/01/2010 05:31:18 PM 1063 Views
Thanks. - 20/01/2010 08:36:58 PM 941 Views
I don't like the idea that she was healed by a woman - 20/01/2010 05:48:19 PM 885 Views
I agree, and it seems unlikely that a new "better" method - 20/01/2010 06:07:04 PM 810 Views
It's NOT due to Stilling or Healing and it's NOT due to Cyndane's weaker body... - 20/01/2010 06:46:08 PM 925 Views
I think Moiraine's gaining strength seems a little too LotR. - 20/01/2010 06:55:34 PM 834 Views
I also like that theory - 20/01/2010 07:14:20 PM 871 Views
I think BS's error regarding Cyndane's strength can also be explained by this theory... - 20/01/2010 07:17:59 PM 827 Views
Yes perhaps - 20/01/2010 07:25:06 PM 864 Views
Cadsuane is considerably stronger than Moiraine - 20/01/2010 07:31:42 PM 842 Views
Nope... - 20/01/2010 07:38:55 PM 818 Views
I disagree as usual - 20/01/2010 07:45:29 PM 728 Views
We don't know the magnitude of what Aes Sedai consider a significant strength difference... - 20/01/2010 07:54:38 PM 818 Views
You are comparing Male and female strength here - 20/01/2010 08:18:45 PM 899 Views
Why do you misquote Moiraine? - 20/01/2010 08:39:55 PM 831 Views
Cadsuane isn't too strong - 21/01/2010 04:19:41 AM 838 Views
Actually... - 21/01/2010 05:57:43 AM 817 Views
Re: Actually... - 21/01/2010 12:31:53 PM 855 Views
Sorry, that was the Glossary... - 21/01/2010 08:07:56 PM 739 Views
- 22/01/2010 11:05:23 AM 925 Views
So Glossary or character? - 22/01/2010 10:22:15 PM 610 Views
Re: Actually... - 12/12/2010 04:42:22 PM 856 Views
Re: I think BS's error regarding Cyndane's strength can also be explained by this theory... - 20/01/2010 07:43:28 PM 826 Views
Agree with both your comments... - 20/01/2010 07:46:07 PM 838 Views
Re: Agree with both your comments... - 20/01/2010 08:24:16 PM 874 Views
But seriously... - 21/01/2010 12:14:16 PM 728 Views
Re: But seriously... - 21/01/2010 12:34:18 PM 902 Views
I don't think it has to be so unique... - 21/01/2010 01:13:00 PM 861 Views
Re: I don't think it has to be so unique... - 21/01/2010 04:49:42 PM 846 Views
Also would explain the question of why Moiraine left the angreal on the wagon instead of using it... - 21/01/2010 02:30:46 PM 839 Views
I think it makes more sense... - 21/01/2010 02:34:30 PM 866 Views
Lanfear would have been toast if Moiraine had the angreal, plus foreknowledge of the confrontation.. - 21/01/2010 02:38:57 PM 817 Views
In her letter to Thom - 21/01/2010 02:55:32 PM 843 Views
One other tiny thing - 21/01/2010 03:18:03 PM 798 Views
Yes, and that is often overlooked - 21/01/2010 04:48:08 PM 744 Views
That's my interpretation, also ... - 21/01/2010 04:00:35 PM 722 Views
Nods in agreement - 21/01/2010 06:24:59 PM 883 Views
I think the "bubble of hope" was simply ... - 21/01/2010 07:08:44 PM 673 Views
Agreed *NM* - 21/01/2010 11:38:43 PM 504 Views
No, I don't think so - 21/01/2010 04:43:53 PM 906 Views
I always figured Lanfear bargained away some power to escape the Finns - 20/01/2010 07:37:31 PM 819 Views
But... - 20/01/2010 07:50:14 PM 871 Views
Re: My Lanfear/Cyndane theory has been disproven. - 20/01/2010 07:51:38 PM 1074 Views
That idea has also been disproven ... - 20/01/2010 08:19:22 PM 959 Views
Agreed... - 20/01/2010 08:36:47 PM 723 Views
Yeah ... - 20/01/2010 08:43:24 PM 864 Views
The closest I ever saw was the "Lightfriend/Purple Ajah" theory - 20/01/2010 08:46:20 PM 1095 Views
Yeah, the Verin revelation was cool... - 20/01/2010 08:48:53 PM 809 Views
Re: That idea has also been disproven ... - 21/01/2010 05:12:45 PM 800 Views
I think it may be more simple than it seems. - 21/01/2010 04:15:05 PM 920 Views
Doesn't fit with BS's words - 21/01/2010 04:27:43 PM 758 Views
Also ... - 21/01/2010 04:32:58 PM 723 Views
I don't think BS words or Cyndane's comments really prove anything. - 21/01/2010 04:42:59 PM 855 Views
BS says that Cyndane is truly weaker. So, this theory is out. *NM* - 21/01/2010 04:46:48 PM 548 Views
Re: BS says that Cyndane is truly weaker. So, this theory is out. - 21/01/2010 04:49:09 PM 845 Views
Well, actually - 21/01/2010 04:54:17 PM 760 Views
Re: Well, actually - 21/01/2010 05:11:10 PM 769 Views
The wording is absolutely unambiguous, but I suppose one can argue everything. *NM* - 21/01/2010 05:24:03 PM 570 Views
Re: The wording is absolutely unambiguous, but I suppose one can argue everything. - 21/01/2010 06:07:09 PM 1075 Views
I agree - 21/01/2010 06:23:34 PM 839 Views
Re: I agree - 21/01/2010 07:59:36 PM 839 Views
Re: I agree - 22/01/2010 07:23:37 AM 748 Views
Re: I agree - 22/01/2010 11:11:55 AM 916 Views
I think... - 21/01/2010 06:46:57 PM 800 Views
Re: I think... - 21/01/2010 06:58:49 PM 688 Views
You are right... - 21/01/2010 07:12:47 PM 788 Views
Re: You are right... - 21/01/2010 07:21:00 PM 891 Views
Anyone who thinks she's hiding her strength is wrong - 21/01/2010 08:09:42 PM 1094 Views
Indeed, it's pretty idiotic. *NM* - 21/01/2010 08:19:53 PM 450 Views
Dude... - 21/01/2010 08:51:08 PM 833 Views
Re: Dude... - 22/01/2010 11:14:08 AM 863 Views
Re: Dude... - 22/01/2010 10:21:15 PM 1006 Views
Meh - 21/01/2010 11:19:16 PM 689 Views
Re: Meh - 22/01/2010 11:15:20 AM 844 Views
Re: Meh - 22/01/2010 03:09:10 PM 787 Views
Re: Meh - 22/01/2010 04:15:51 PM 811 Views
actually if one really wants to figure out what happened to Cyndane - 21/01/2010 07:00:33 PM 979 Views
Dumb question, but do transmigrated souls need to re-reach their full potential? - 21/01/2010 06:19:57 PM 819 Views
It seems like they start out as powerful as they were, but I don't think it's ever been stated *NM* - 21/01/2010 06:44:45 PM 539 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 21/01/2010 07:03:13 PM 465 Views
That's what I thought. *NM* - 21/01/2010 10:05:38 PM 482 Views

Reply to Message