Active Users:415 Time:20/04/2025 01:49:50 PM
there is no such thing as a circle of 6 and 6 darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 16/01/2010 03:35:17 AM
BWB

Other gender mixes are possible in a link as well. The number of men in a circle is limited only be the fact that with the exceptions of the linking of one man and one woman or of two men and one woman ( and of course, of two men and two women), there must always be at least one more woman in the circle than the number of men. Thus, three men would need four women to be in a circle together, four men would need five women, and so on. There can also be smaller circles than thirteen, whether of women alone or of men and women.

The cumulative strength of a circle depends on its size, the strengths of the individuals linked, whether or not angreal or sa'angreal are used, and the balance between male and female members in the circle. Although men are stronger than women, the strongest linked circles were those which contained nearly equal numbers of men and women. A smaller circle with a closer balance can be stronger than a larger unbalanced circle.


Except in very small circles there must always be at least 1 more woman than men. And there is nothing to say that a circle of 37 women and 35 men is not the most potent.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
LTT and the bore. - 16/01/2010 02:50:34 AM 1421 Views
I think there is a scene in KoD or CoT - 16/01/2010 02:57:13 AM 719 Views
Re: I think there is a scene in KoD or CoT - 16/01/2010 03:23:14 AM 737 Views
I always thought the scene with Cadsuane an empty threat... - 16/01/2010 12:28:17 PM 644 Views
It had to be a circle of six men and six women... - 16/01/2010 03:18:16 AM 678 Views
there is no such thing as a circle of 6 and 6 - 16/01/2010 03:35:17 AM 595 Views
Re: It had to be a circle of six men and six women... - 16/01/2010 03:37:49 AM 662 Views
Here's the quote... - 16/01/2010 06:02:49 AM 713 Views
Re: Here's the quote... - 16/01/2010 04:00:11 PM 613 Views
Dude, you seem to not read what is written... - 16/01/2010 07:28:27 PM 613 Views
Hmm... - 18/01/2010 11:21:41 AM 546 Views
I think... - 16/01/2010 11:31:18 AM 708 Views
Re: I think... - 16/01/2010 01:27:40 PM 656 Views
In my view... - 16/01/2010 01:50:03 PM 518 Views
Re: In my view... - 16/01/2010 02:11:20 PM 525 Views
We know... - 16/01/2010 02:43:41 PM 646 Views
Its presented as fact - 16/01/2010 03:00:33 PM 530 Views
Here is a quote by RJ - 16/01/2010 03:10:28 PM 567 Views
Re: Here is a quote by RJ - 16/01/2010 03:26:13 PM 607 Views
In my opinion - 16/01/2010 03:51:02 PM 510 Views
RJ was as slippery as an AS! - 16/01/2010 04:31:02 PM 523 Views
Re: RJ was as slippery as an AS! - 18/01/2010 06:09:40 AM 481 Views
RJ could be tricky, true... - 19/01/2010 02:56:05 PM 489 Views
RJ changed his mind about a lot of stuff throughout the series - 22/01/2010 06:35:09 PM 527 Views
Re: We know... - 16/01/2010 03:17:54 PM 594 Views
It's in any case clear... - 16/01/2010 03:27:49 PM 498 Views
Re: It's in any case clear... - 16/01/2010 03:44:33 PM 550 Views
I don't think - 16/01/2010 03:56:25 PM 544 Views
The question is how many people were still alive? - 18/01/2010 06:19:49 AM 577 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 19/01/2010 02:47:58 PM 203 Views
Did you read my second post? *NM* - 16/01/2010 03:42:23 PM 319 Views
My Thoughts - 16/01/2010 09:43:33 PM 519 Views
The women needed to balance the men - 18/01/2010 12:12:27 PM 594 Views
What if Rand usesTP to off the DO? - 22/01/2010 05:54:13 PM 516 Views

Reply to Message