Technically, Egwene was wrong to scold the rebels for splitting - the split was the right and necessary thing to do, and that doesn't just change because the Tower is whole now. The WT AS were wrong in their support of Elaida; misguided and ignorant, true, but still in the wrong.
However, pointing out this fact would achieve nothing. If anything, it would tick off the remaining WT Aes Sedai, and threaten Egwene's grip on authority. What she needed to do was demonstrate that she was impartial to sides - neither the rebels nor loyal Aes Sedai mattered; her loyalty was to the Tower. To achieve that end, it was a wise political move to 'scold' the rebels a bit.
She was effectively reassuring those Aes Sedai who stayed in Tar Valon, that there wasn't going to be a radical change in hierarchy. She was telling them that she could see things from their point of view.
I would liken it to a mother who scold her children when they get in a fight. It doesn't matter who was right or wrong, you shouldn't have been fighting.
However, pointing out this fact would achieve nothing. If anything, it would tick off the remaining WT Aes Sedai, and threaten Egwene's grip on authority. What she needed to do was demonstrate that she was impartial to sides - neither the rebels nor loyal Aes Sedai mattered; her loyalty was to the Tower. To achieve that end, it was a wise political move to 'scold' the rebels a bit.
She was effectively reassuring those Aes Sedai who stayed in Tar Valon, that there wasn't going to be a radical change in hierarchy. She was telling them that she could see things from their point of view.
I would liken it to a mother who scold her children when they get in a fight. It doesn't matter who was right or wrong, you shouldn't have been fighting.
"Take the Gleeman!" Rand and Mat cried, throwing Thom to the Myrddraal. Then they ran away as fast as they could, and Thom's screams quickly faded into the distance along with any inconvenient feelings of guilt.
Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
12/01/2010 05:13:59 PM
- 6795 Views
She was right, as long as she never mentions it again
12/01/2010 05:19:38 PM
- 723 Views
I didn't expect it, but it was absolutely the right thing for her to do.
12/01/2010 06:13:42 PM
- 709 Views
She was absolutely right and I love to hear good beratings.
12/01/2010 06:49:56 PM
- 662 Views
Like you'd say anything else. *NM*
13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
- 267 Views
If the berating sucked, I would have complained. But it was pretty good to hear/read. *NM*
13/01/2010 04:33:29 PM
- 303 Views
Re: Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
12/01/2010 06:58:40 PM
- 632 Views
Reasonable in terms of power politics, but still somewhat deceitful.
12/01/2010 07:06:33 PM
- 683 Views
Re: Was Egwene wrong to berate both Halls after the reunification?
12/01/2010 07:20:30 PM
- 730 Views
I doubt it.
12/01/2010 09:58:40 PM
- 590 Views
It was a political move. It was the right political move, but not "morally" right.
12/01/2010 08:03:27 PM
- 612 Views
Ugly, IMO, but a keen political manuever
12/01/2010 09:31:48 PM
- 569 Views
It was very clear where her sympathies lie. A lot of it was superficial.
12/01/2010 10:41:09 PM
- 714 Views
She didn't mention/berate the 300+ AS who ignored this whole facade of a plotline.
13/01/2010 01:27:02 AM
- 608 Views
it's not like they were there to berate! *NM*
13/01/2010 04:10:49 AM
- 244 Views
Wait until they come back and she slams them for "ignoring the Tower in its hour of need." *NM*
13/01/2010 04:20:55 AM
- 250 Views
She should
13/01/2010 04:22:13 AM
- 650 Views
They probably had more important matters than the privileges of a tiny group of powerful women.
14/01/2010 12:11:04 AM
- 617 Views
right, they were very very busy doing a whole lot of nothing
14/01/2010 12:13:06 AM
- 545 Views
Keeping an eye on the transition between rulers of the most powerful country IS more important
18/01/2010 12:19:17 PM
- 725 Views
they've been coming and going for months ... with no indication of what they are really up too
19/01/2010 06:24:27 AM
- 581 Views
What part of "keeping an eye on" suggests action or interference?
22/01/2010 01:38:52 PM
- 584 Views
It depends what she does next. It was really a tactical thing and politics can excuse the hypocrisy
13/01/2010 04:20:06 AM
- 679 Views