Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
"Here's another possibility I hadn't mentioned previously. Maybe even damage below the irreparable state causes severe trouble, like the time/space chaos we've observed in the later books. Things like rooms changing places or the Village in Shiota or Hinderstap."
I said something similar to this ine one of my replies. My argument went like this: There was a lot of damage to the Pattern done during the War of Power, this damage was lessened when balefire stopped being used en masse but it was not halted because the Dark One continued to touch the world. In the current Age, the Pattern may not have fully recovered from this past damage, especially given that the world is still reeling from the W.O.P. and The Breaking, so using balefire in such a way at all may be enough to cause a serious rupture in the Pattern.
I think the best way to envision the Age Lace would be to think of the Narrative Chart AesJedai posted in a separate thread (link is attached). Though the flow of the chart does not show specific character actions, you can chart each character's whereabouts during climactic parts of the War of the Ring. Given a sufficient familiarity with the Book, you can say that removing certain threads causes the entire tapestry of lines to fall apart, because during particular moments, the lives and wellbeings of others depended on the actions of that particular thread. Using WoT terminology, for example, if you balefired Arwen, who in the grand scheme of things had a relatively small part to play in the movie, from time/space before she rescued Frodo, Frodo would be dead, and the entire tapestry would fall into a new form after many fluctuations - the yellow-bordered green line may or may not survive the poisoned wound, or it may not make it to the Ring's Destruction. Given that we don't know the relative importance of each and every thread in the Pattern, nor what these threads were supposed to do in the future, you could cause a major rupture in the Pattern by the removal of many such "one note" players.
I said something similar to this ine one of my replies. My argument went like this: There was a lot of damage to the Pattern done during the War of Power, this damage was lessened when balefire stopped being used en masse but it was not halted because the Dark One continued to touch the world. In the current Age, the Pattern may not have fully recovered from this past damage, especially given that the world is still reeling from the W.O.P. and The Breaking, so using balefire in such a way at all may be enough to cause a serious rupture in the Pattern.
I think the best way to envision the Age Lace would be to think of the Narrative Chart AesJedai posted in a separate thread (link is attached). Though the flow of the chart does not show specific character actions, you can chart each character's whereabouts during climactic parts of the War of the Ring. Given a sufficient familiarity with the Book, you can say that removing certain threads causes the entire tapestry of lines to fall apart, because during particular moments, the lives and wellbeings of others depended on the actions of that particular thread. Using WoT terminology, for example, if you balefired Arwen, who in the grand scheme of things had a relatively small part to play in the movie, from time/space before she rescued Frodo, Frodo would be dead, and the entire tapestry would fall into a new form after many fluctuations - the yellow-bordered green line may or may not survive the poisoned wound, or it may not make it to the Ring's Destruction. Given that we don't know the relative importance of each and every thread in the Pattern, nor what these threads were supposed to do in the future, you could cause a major rupture in the Pattern by the removal of many such "one note" players.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1543 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 946 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 788 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 912 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 811 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 783 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 728 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 859 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 773 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 822 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 705 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 793 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 738 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 722 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1216 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 858 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 726 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 391 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 753 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 427 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 710 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 842 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 742 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 753 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 772 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 760 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 759 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 783 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 729 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 715 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 687 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 792 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 675 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 748 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 753 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 775 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 712 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 778 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 720 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 657 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 840 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 767 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 738 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 846 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 693 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 700 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 779 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 711 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 754 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 691 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 695 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 770 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 701 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 847 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 802 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 758 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 792 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 686 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 787 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 777 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 699 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 772 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 790 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 690 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 986 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 733 Views