Active Users:612 Time:24/02/2025 08:57:24 AM
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. Datakim Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
Rand Travels in disguised under an illusion of invisibility, tracks Graendal down by advancing through her palace and balefires her while she is bathing.


Triggers wards like Sammaels, Graendal flees.


Or a re-use of the Rahvin Scenario: Rand Travels in with a fighting force with orders to only kill those Compelled to attack them, he brings Nynayeve/Cadsuane/random Aes Sedai in his retinue/Wondergirl/a channeling member of his harem/Wise Ones in to detect saidar. Graendal has some sort of defense that doesn't take him out, he chases her down preventing her Gateways from opening all the way each time she tries and finally balefires her just as she's about to escape through an inverted Gateway.


How will Rand chase her? How will he prevent her gateways from opening all the way? How will he reach her in time when she could be anywhere in the palace and she will flee at the instant she senses trouble.

I suppose you could argue that Rand's tav'eren nature would make it so that he could just randomly open a gateway anywhere and accidentally open it ontop of Graendal. But if I start accepting explanations like that, any debate becomes meaningless.

Oh, and I love how you just mention "Graendal has some sort of defense that doesn't take him out" as if its the most natural thing in the world. For all we know Rand would have perished the instant he went anywhere near. Graendal has had months or years even to prepare her little fort with countless wards and traps.

The point is that Rand/LTT makes it clear that this kind of surprise attack is not possible. Since you did not read that part of the book, I will write it for you here.


How? How can I kill a foe who is more clever than myself, a foe who is _impossible to surprise_ yet who is also _unwilling to confront me_?


I think LTT knows Graendal better than you do. If he says she is impossible to surprise, I believe him. And that means your suggestions will not work.

That was the whole _point_ of the scene and this whole thing. That surprising or confronting Graendal the way he did Rahvin and the others is simply not possible. Thats how Graendal operates. To accept your plans, would mean accepting that Graendal is not actually Graendal.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1571 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 970 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 967 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 996 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 901 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 808 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 930 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 840 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 809 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 761 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 752 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 721 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 745 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 728 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 888 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 795 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 848 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 734 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 829 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 770 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 750 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 756 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 861 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 877 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 790 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 904 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 717 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 751 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 399 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 784 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 786 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 750 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 440 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 732 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 358 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 741 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 714 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 849 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 768 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 799 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 800 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 785 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 782 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 804 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 760 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 815 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 702 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 789 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 774 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 779 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 796 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 739 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 811 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 745 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 684 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 864 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 795 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 765 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 729 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 787 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 694 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 719 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 873 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 719 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 724 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 801 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 744 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 777 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 853 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 725 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 727 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 792 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 732 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 876 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 829 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 784 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 818 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 712 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 816 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 759 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 803 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 727 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 803 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 964 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1069 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 697 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 739 Views

Reply to Message