Active Users:908 Time:23/12/2024 04:57:25 PM
Is Rand logical when he estimates female danger? Sidious Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 03:34:05 PM
LOC (Gifts) - In the mirror his head tilted as if he was listening, and he nodded, voice dropping to a murmur. “Yes, I can handle three, if they aren’t too strong… Of course, if one of them is Moghedien in a wig, or Semirhage, I may be in trouble.”

What do you really think of this statement?

Technically any of the following could be true...

1. One of the women could be as strong as the Forsaken. Rand plays a huge gamble by assuming that no one in the Tower is a high level channeler. It's even more likely that a woman of that strength would be sent after him if they decided to take him. One of them could have been Nynaeve or Sharina, for instance.

2. The women could have angreal or sa'angreal. This is even more likely considering the precautions the Tower would take if they sent a group of women to trap him. "Take Vora's sa'angreal along and capture al'Thor, Galina"

3. They could send one woman into the room and have the other thirteen in a circle outside. The range of a circle doesn't seem to be that limited. She could probably still wield the full power of the circle even if they were outside.

In the end it comes down to risks, I guess. Rand can't hide away from Aes Sedai all the time on the off-chance that the emissary is covered in sa'angreal. He's probably reasonably sure that he can handle three women in most situations. Taim is even more dismissive of facing three women. Maybe he's stupid though - Elayne is a very strong woman and even worse, she has a turtle angreal. He might have found himself in for a nasty surprise.

If you were a high strength male, how would you agree to meet groups of potentially threatening females? Would you meet any group of less than thirteen? Would you also stop at three or scoff at three?
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Is Rand logical when he estimates female danger? - 07/01/2010 03:34:05 PM 1437 Views
Basically you have to be ready for anything! - 07/01/2010 03:45:31 PM 791 Views
Yep. Send Daigian in Linked with 12 of her buddies (one of whom is holding an angreal) & hes screwed - 07/01/2010 05:19:03 PM 1013 Views
Miscommunication seems to be a major theme of the series *NM* - 07/01/2010 07:17:16 PM 402 Views
As well as missed opportunities. - 07/01/2010 09:27:56 PM 720 Views
yes, the Amyrlin story line could have been wrapped up much earlier! - 07/01/2010 09:55:30 PM 827 Views
Yeah, I really wish his vision had been pushed. - 07/01/2010 10:16:15 PM 650 Views
ROFL - 08/01/2010 01:01:03 AM 627 Views
Re: ROFL - 08/01/2010 02:43:50 PM 667 Views
For a major theme, it sure is surprising - 08/01/2010 04:10:22 AM 708 Views
really? miscommunication seems to be woven into just about every sentence - 08/01/2010 04:53:48 AM 646 Views
Re: really? miscommunication seems to be woven into just about every sentence - 08/01/2010 04:10:04 PM 736 Views
Re: Is Rand logical when he estimates female danger? - 07/01/2010 03:48:14 PM 830 Views
Thanks for pointing to that Taim incident... its another proof... - 07/01/2010 04:15:33 PM 785 Views
I always like to think that Egwene, Elayne and Aviendha Linked can match Rand. - 07/01/2010 05:26:35 PM 712 Views
Those three... - 07/01/2010 05:35:24 PM 686 Views
I think this is probably close - 07/01/2010 07:19:40 PM 843 Views
- 07/01/2010 08:51:15 PM 859 Views
HA! - 07/01/2010 09:01:14 PM 807 Views
Re: HA! - 08/01/2010 11:37:06 AM 837 Views
Re: HA! - 08/01/2010 04:21:01 PM 640 Views
d'oh ... you've got him there - 08/01/2010 05:35:15 PM 582 Views
Hmm... - 09/01/2010 03:02:04 PM 624 Views
Re: Hmm... - 09/01/2010 04:47:05 PM 748 Views
Re: Hmm... - 09/01/2010 05:06:06 PM 744 Views
as we've discussed in the past, it's very loose - 09/01/2010 06:20:26 PM 834 Views
Re: as we've discussed in the past, it's very loose - 09/01/2010 07:32:57 PM 2963 Views
Re: as we've discussed in the past, it's very loose - 09/01/2010 09:05:01 PM 827 Views
Re: as we've discussed in the past, it's very loose - 09/01/2010 09:15:32 PM 967 Views
Re: as we've discussed in the past, it's very loose - 10/01/2010 02:06:09 AM 775 Views
There are issues, of course! - 09/01/2010 06:17:08 PM 942 Views
Re: There are issues, of course! - 09/01/2010 07:18:03 PM 902 Views
I think I fall in between you guys - 09/01/2010 08:46:58 PM 831 Views
Getting tired of this merry go round, but here we go again... - 07/01/2010 09:08:59 PM 742 Views
Don't get on it! It causes insanity. - 07/01/2010 09:29:15 PM 648 Views
d'uh - 07/01/2010 09:57:30 PM 735 Views
For the last time! - 07/01/2010 09:50:16 PM 907 Views
it's about EFFECTIVE strength Fionwe (jk) - 07/01/2010 10:05:48 PM 605 Views
I don't think they were that bad back then, but still... - 07/01/2010 10:11:46 PM 717 Views
and he's gone out of his way IMO to show that it's a stupid - 07/01/2010 10:41:03 PM 776 Views
Re: I don't think they were that bad back then, but still... - 08/01/2010 11:38:48 AM 633 Views
I'd actually go with Elayne in matters of battle. - 08/01/2010 02:47:34 PM 743 Views
Wow, I wasn't expecting that - 08/01/2010 02:55:53 PM 825 Views
I'm not too impressed with the Forsaken so far. - 08/01/2010 03:30:43 PM 649 Views
I'm tempted to go with Taim too, but... - 08/01/2010 04:25:52 PM 691 Views
If Elayne had wanted Taim dead, he and his minions would have been dead - 08/01/2010 05:41:29 PM 740 Views
The reverse would be true too, though... - 08/01/2010 05:50:02 PM 653 Views
But she just heard Taim say to basically stand down - 08/01/2010 06:05:43 PM 702 Views
But... - 08/01/2010 08:53:11 PM 903 Views
Ah but Elayne also knew they knew Rand wouldn't allow it - 08/01/2010 10:40:45 PM 751 Views
That whole lack of communication thing made my eye twitch. - 08/01/2010 11:00:25 PM 765 Views
or just painfully stupid! - 08/01/2010 11:10:37 PM 586 Views
Re: But... - 10/01/2010 03:20:12 AM 760 Views
Re: Is Rand logical when he estimates female danger? - 07/01/2010 05:13:48 PM 642 Views
I think he is illogical towards all danger, regardless of gender. - 07/01/2010 06:39:37 PM 654 Views
It's all kind of irrelevant. - 08/01/2010 11:28:46 PM 917 Views

Reply to Message