Active Users:1423 Time:17/10/2025 09:34:27 PM
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing Datakim Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM

Is in any way qualified to be the judge/jury/executioner of these poor souls. He took away any possible chance they may have had of ever being freed of her! Nynaeve thinks about this after he tricked her into unraveling Kerbs compulsion... it would be like a Judge deciding that a person must be pulled off life support without having a Dr. examine them first... simply because others who had the same injury could not be cured.

I find that repugnant!

Your argument is around what people who are currently incapable of choosing would choose... I say they would choose to be cured, or at least have the effort made to be cured before they were summarily executed for being mind controlled.


But LTT/Rand DID have experience. He did know. You say that it was like a judge deciding to pull someone from life support without having a doctor examine them first. A good argument.

But I would argue that this is not true. I think doctors DID examine the patients to see if there was hope of recovery before pulling the plug. A lot of doctors with more overall experience than Nynaeve.

I speak ofcourse of the restorers in the AoL. There is no way I will believe that the AoLers did not try to heal damage caused by Graendal. And yet LTT knows that no-one managed to do it in the AoL. He even quotes the name of one such unfortunate person.

So yes, I think Rand has pretty good reasons to think that there really was no hope for Graendals unfortunate victims, and that Nynaeves belief that they could be healed is wrong. Nynaeve cannot even bring back Rand's hand. How is she supposed to fix a BRAIN that has been utterly destroyed.

The fact that stilling was healed is irrelevant. Just because Nynaeve managed to do it (a remarkable feat to be sure), does not mean that she is better in every area of healing than AoL healers.

Let me ask you a question. What would you have done in Rand's place?



As for LTT and Balefire ... what makes you think LTT was in control at that point? Every other scene with BF and LTT we've had LTT talks about the dangers, even the Forsaken pretty much refuse to use it!


I was wrong about the balefire.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1685 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1091 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1085 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1124 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 1015 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 913 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 1033 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 943 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 922 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 867 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 875 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 827 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 861 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 842 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 986 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 896 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 964 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 885 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 953 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 883 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 946 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 860 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 980 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 981 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 912 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 1015 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 823 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 965 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 466 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 887 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 903 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 852 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 488 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 834 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 476 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 849 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 817 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 958 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 878 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 913 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 916 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 908 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 899 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 935 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 859 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 965 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 804 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 909 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 873 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 894 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 904 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 851 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 922 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 867 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 797 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 966 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 912 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 904 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 863 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 894 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 802 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 824 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 986 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 823 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 832 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 913 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 882 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 890 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 956 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 818 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 844 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 906 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 843 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 986 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 942 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 887 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 922 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 824 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 942 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 892 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 907 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 831 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 909 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1074 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1207 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 800 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 856 Views

Reply to Message