Active Users:373 Time:02/07/2025 02:57:57 AM
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing Datakim Send a noteboard - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM

Is in any way qualified to be the judge/jury/executioner of these poor souls. He took away any possible chance they may have had of ever being freed of her! Nynaeve thinks about this after he tricked her into unraveling Kerbs compulsion... it would be like a Judge deciding that a person must be pulled off life support without having a Dr. examine them first... simply because others who had the same injury could not be cured.

I find that repugnant!

Your argument is around what people who are currently incapable of choosing would choose... I say they would choose to be cured, or at least have the effort made to be cured before they were summarily executed for being mind controlled.


But LTT/Rand DID have experience. He did know. You say that it was like a judge deciding to pull someone from life support without having a doctor examine them first. A good argument.

But I would argue that this is not true. I think doctors DID examine the patients to see if there was hope of recovery before pulling the plug. A lot of doctors with more overall experience than Nynaeve.

I speak ofcourse of the restorers in the AoL. There is no way I will believe that the AoLers did not try to heal damage caused by Graendal. And yet LTT knows that no-one managed to do it in the AoL. He even quotes the name of one such unfortunate person.

So yes, I think Rand has pretty good reasons to think that there really was no hope for Graendals unfortunate victims, and that Nynaeves belief that they could be healed is wrong. Nynaeve cannot even bring back Rand's hand. How is she supposed to fix a BRAIN that has been utterly destroyed.

The fact that stilling was healed is irrelevant. Just because Nynaeve managed to do it (a remarkable feat to be sure), does not mean that she is better in every area of healing than AoL healers.

Let me ask you a question. What would you have done in Rand's place?



As for LTT and Balefire ... what makes you think LTT was in control at that point? Every other scene with BF and LTT we've had LTT talks about the dangers, even the Forsaken pretty much refuse to use it!


I was wrong about the balefire.
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1619 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 1021 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 1016 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 1046 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 949 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 856 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 974 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 892 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 859 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 808 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 811 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 770 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 796 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 777 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 932 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 840 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 902 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 790 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 883 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 816 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 855 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 800 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 911 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 926 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 840 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 950 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 766 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 870 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 427 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 830 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 848 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 800 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 460 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 778 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 430 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 787 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 760 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 897 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 816 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 855 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 849 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 836 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 831 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 850 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 809 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 866 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 751 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 843 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 822 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 830 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 844 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 788 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 857 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 786 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 730 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 909 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 844 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 826 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 778 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 833 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 744 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 765 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 921 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 763 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 772 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 847 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 793 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 825 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 902 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 771 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 776 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 839 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 780 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 924 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 880 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 830 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 863 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 759 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 868 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 819 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 847 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 775 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 854 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 1011 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1139 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 742 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 784 Views

Reply to Message