Rand doesn't know; even his explanation of why he did this did not include greater knowledge of the mechanism. He just said Graendal was so dangerous that killing innocent souls to get rid of her was worthwhile. He's not the Creator, doesn't understand the higher laws of reality and neither are Nynaeve or Min. Truly, I think Cadsuane hit the nail on the head when she backed Min up - if Rand himself utilized balefire in such a way that reality wa destabilized and the Bore was torn open, it wouldn't matter if the balefired souls would be Reborn in one, two or whatever Turnings of the Wheel RJ specified - the Dark One would have destroyed reality in any case, and it would be Rand's fault.
I mean, technically, carrying your line of argument to it's ultimate conclusion, it wouldn't even matter if you balefired a Forsaken because they would come back, anyway. They'd be removed from the field, but there are quite a lot of twisted entities such as Shaidar Haran or Slayer that technically speaking, are much more difficult for a Third Age channeler to comprehend or deal with.
I basically think, in the context of the overall story, that the WoT world is largely a post-apocalyptic one, and destabilizing the Pattern in any way when it is already frayed to the breaking point is not a good idea.
I mean, technically, carrying your line of argument to it's ultimate conclusion, it wouldn't even matter if you balefired a Forsaken because they would come back, anyway. They'd be removed from the field, but there are quite a lot of twisted entities such as Shaidar Haran or Slayer that technically speaking, are much more difficult for a Third Age channeler to comprehend or deal with.
I basically think, in the context of the overall story, that the WoT world is largely a post-apocalyptic one, and destabilizing the Pattern in any way when it is already frayed to the breaking point is not a good idea.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1513 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 916 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 757 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 880 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 784 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 756 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 693 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 830 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 751 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 789 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 675 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 757 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 709 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 695 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1190 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 826 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 699 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 380 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 729 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 413 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 680 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 819 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 716 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 720 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 741 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 732 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 723 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 750 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 698 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 678 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 663 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 765 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 641 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 720 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 729 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 741 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 683 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 750 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 688 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 631 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 806 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 735 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 705 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 820 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 659 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 673 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 745 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 680 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 723 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 664 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 663 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 738 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 673 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 816 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 774 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 732 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 762 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 656 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 760 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 743 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 669 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 743 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 750 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 658 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 954 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 700 Views