We don't even know, if all people in the palace were drones (and also Rand couldn't know). For example, Ituralde also visited Graendal in her palace once, and wasn't a drone. Such visitors might have been in the palace, when Rand destroyed it. But in the end, Rand doesn't care about such collateral damage, because he wants Graendal.
LTT, who should know believes that Graendal would never be willing to let someone serve her who was not a drone. Though I admit that you are correct about the possibility of visitors. I would say however that the odds are in favor that Rand killed only drones.
But even if someone innocent died, well, that is tragic yes. But this is war and the unfortunately reality is that in war, people die. What if when Rand created that shadowspawn blasting weave in the Stone, a trolloc was standing too close to an innocent and the innocent was killed in the blast. Does that mean Rand should have done nothing and just let the trollocs all run loose rather than take the chance that he MIGHT kill someone with friendly fire.
From the PoV of Rand (and Min&Nynaeve), it was highly likely that only Graendal was alive there. And Graendal had to die. The chance had to be taken. And it is likely that by doing so, by killing Graendal (presumably), he saved a lot of people who would otherwise have been killed or mindraped by her in the future. Possibly many thousands.
What Rand did here was really not that different from what he did when he killed Rahvin and was flinging fire around. Or when he attacked Dashiva&co after they blew his room. He had no way of being 100% certain that bystanders would not be caught in the act, but he did his best, with the knowledge he had, to make sure they were not. Just as he did here.
But Min and Nynaeve seemed to act as though he deliberately set out to commit mass murder here when that is clearly not the case. So while we cannot know for sure, I repeat, Graendal was likely the only living person to die.
If you don't act in war because of some minute chance that there might be innocents in the way, you will never be able to do anything at all and you will lose the war.
War sucks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91f29/91f29e23c37a143e9205f4fd2a1c1127999fc900" alt=":("
The point is that the incident with Graendal's palace seems like the catalyst for Rand losing the rest of all restraints (and humanity) to use balefire on a large scale. After he destroyed the palace, the next big thing he considers is balefiring all the Seanchan bulwarks, although the Seanchan are common enemies and Rand is aware that innocent people might die as well.
But why? Why would this incident be a turning point rather than when he channeled the TP. As I have tried to argue, while harsh, what Rand did here was not the horrific evil that it was portraid as.
Seems more likely to me that the moment Rand touched TP, he started going crazy and that what happened here had nothing to do with the scenes later at Far Madding and Ebou Dar.
Doubt that Min is such aware of the mechanics of rebirth and balefire. However, her thoughts imply that she thinks a balefire death is final.
Herid Fel was since he knew that the wheel kept turning and the souls kept being reborn and the DO was sealed and released and sealed and so on.
Min has been studying his books to the point that she has figured out much of what Fel knew. Seems strange that she would not realise that if balefire destroyed souls, after a few turnings there would be none left.
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1571 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 970 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 808 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 930 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 840 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 809 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 761 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 888 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 794 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 848 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 734 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 829 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 770 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 749 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1240 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 877 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 750 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 399 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 783 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 440 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 731 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 849 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 768 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 799 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 799 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 785 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 782 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 804 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 760 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 741 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 717 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 815 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 702 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 774 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 779 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 795 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 739 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 811 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 745 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 684 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 864 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 794 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 764 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 873 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 719 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 724 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 801 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 744 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 777 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 724 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 727 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 792 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 732 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 875 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 829 Views
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da91f/da91f10caa9e01a3b2f4e6ed865432effe6ee41c" alt=""
Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 784 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 818 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 712 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 816 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 803 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 727 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 803 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 810 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 720 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 1013 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 761 Views