BF does not go on infinitely - it's range is relative to it's power.
Also, it's not how many people die that matters (at least, from a Pattern POV, not from an ethical POV) in terms of damage to the Pattern. Brandon stated that all items/objects also have threads.
Think of it this way - using BF is like pouring hot, molten lava into a big bowl. If you pour small droplets in, then the bowl will cool down before each droplet, but if you pour lots on at once, it will start to melt.
So it's not about how the BF is used so much as it's about how much BF is used.
At least, that's my understanding.
Also, it's not how many people die that matters (at least, from a Pattern POV, not from an ethical POV) in terms of damage to the Pattern. Brandon stated that all items/objects also have threads.
Think of it this way - using BF is like pouring hot, molten lava into a big bowl. If you pour small droplets in, then the bowl will cool down before each droplet, but if you pour lots on at once, it will start to melt.
So it's not about how the BF is used so much as it's about how much BF is used.
At least, that's my understanding.
Rand the psycho?
- 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
1592 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
991 Views
On Balefire
- 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM
990 Views
Good point
- 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM
1014 Views
On the nature of BaleFire
- 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM
920 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
- 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
830 Views
Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
949 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
861 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
831 Views
Re: Wait!
- 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
784 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
904 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
813 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
875 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
755 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
849 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
786 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
- 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
797 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
- 11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
1263 Views
Rand crossed a line
- 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
899 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
- 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
787 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
409 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
- 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
802 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
- 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
447 Views
LOL ... super-death!
- 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
752 Views
Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
868 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
790 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
828 Views
Re: Yes it was.
- 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
819 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
805 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
- 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
803 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
824 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
- 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
780 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
762 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
- 07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
736 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
- 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
835 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
- 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
722 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
796 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
801 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
816 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
757 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
831 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
762 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
704 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
- 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
882 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
- 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
816 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
- 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
793 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
- 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
891 Views
Meh
- 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
738 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
743 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
821 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
766 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
- 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
798 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
- 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
742 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
748 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
812 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
751 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
- 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
896 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions 
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
849 Views
- 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
849 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
- 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
805 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
- 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
837 Views
I concede
- 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
731 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
- 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
840 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
826 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
- 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
749 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
- 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
823 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
- 07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
826 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
- 08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
741 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
- 09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
1043 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
- 07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
780 Views