Active Users:1150 Time:23/11/2024 05:17:50 AM
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. Datakim Send a noteboard - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
Hundreds of channelers fighting with balefire could have wiped out a city in a matter of minutes.

'Course, maybe he actually does mean in a single attack, but I see no reason to believe that.


Umm. He did indeed say "one go". It seems pretty clear to me that he implied that the city was taken out in a single blow. Like a balefire nuclear missile.

I don't understand how you see "one go", and think that means hundreds of different "gos" over a longer period.

RJ said what he said, and I think this time you are the one making an unwarranted assumption.

I think there is enough circumstantial evidence for me to argue that there is indeed a way of modifying balefire and that Rand knowing how thanks to LTT, used a wide beam that was still weak enough not to cause massive damage to the pattern.
This message last edited by Datakim on 06/01/2010 at 04:18:51 PM
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1513 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 916 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 917 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 939 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 845 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 757 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 880 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 784 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 756 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 693 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 724 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 696 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 695 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 677 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 830 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 752 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 789 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 675 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 757 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 709 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 695 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 700 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 793 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 826 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 735 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 845 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 665 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 699 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 380 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 729 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 730 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 697 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 413 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 680 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 333 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 676 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 654 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 819 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 716 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 720 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 741 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 732 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 723 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 751 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 698 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 765 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 641 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 730 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 720 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 729 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 741 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 683 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 751 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 688 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 631 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 806 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 735 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 705 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 664 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 725 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 662 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 666 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 820 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 659 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 673 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 745 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 680 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 723 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 795 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 664 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 664 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 738 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 673 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 816 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 774 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 732 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 762 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 656 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 760 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 707 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 744 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 669 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 743 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 908 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1004 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 640 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 689 Views

Reply to Message