He showed that he is willing to use balefire on a large scale to destroy a whole palace with a Forsaken in it, even if he kills innocent people alongside the Forsaken (and even if all those people were "drones", they are still innocent and not the real targets).
As it's shown later in TGS, Rand starts then to see balefire as a common weapon. He already contemplates to balefire Tam and all the Seanchan. The next possible step would be that Rand considers to balefire whole cities, which don't bow to him or if he just believes that a Forsaken is inside the city. Ultimately such an attitude threatens humankind and the Pattern. Therefore balefire is forbidden and to use it widespread as Rand did an atrocity. Even the Forsaken don't want to use balefire this way anymore.
Besides that, Min and Nynaeve apparently - wrongly - believe that someone who was balefired can never be reborn, which would make its use even more horrific.
As it's shown later in TGS, Rand starts then to see balefire as a common weapon. He already contemplates to balefire Tam and all the Seanchan. The next possible step would be that Rand considers to balefire whole cities, which don't bow to him or if he just believes that a Forsaken is inside the city. Ultimately such an attitude threatens humankind and the Pattern. Therefore balefire is forbidden and to use it widespread as Rand did an atrocity. Even the Forsaken don't want to use balefire this way anymore.
Besides that, Min and Nynaeve apparently - wrongly - believe that someone who was balefired can never be reborn, which would make its use even more horrific.
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1583 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 984 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 822 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 939 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 853 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 820 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 775 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 897 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 806 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 864 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 746 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 841 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 778 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 772 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1253 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 889 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 765 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 405 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 792 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 443 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 740 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 859 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 777 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 812 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 810 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 794 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 793 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 816 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 772 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 751 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 726 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 822 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 712 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 782 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 794 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 808 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 749 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 821 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 754 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 694 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 872 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 806 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 781 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 882 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 728 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 733 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 813 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 754 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 786 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 735 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 737 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 803 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 741 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 886 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 839 Views

Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 794 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 828 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 722 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 830 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 815 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 738 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 812 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 818 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 731 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 1029 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 769 Views