He showed that he is willing to use balefire on a large scale to destroy a whole palace with a Forsaken in it, even if he kills innocent people alongside the Forsaken (and even if all those people were "drones", they are still innocent and not the real targets).
As it's shown later in TGS, Rand starts then to see balefire as a common weapon. He already contemplates to balefire Tam and all the Seanchan. The next possible step would be that Rand considers to balefire whole cities, which don't bow to him or if he just believes that a Forsaken is inside the city. Ultimately such an attitude threatens humankind and the Pattern. Therefore balefire is forbidden and to use it widespread as Rand did an atrocity. Even the Forsaken don't want to use balefire this way anymore.
Besides that, Min and Nynaeve apparently - wrongly - believe that someone who was balefired can never be reborn, which would make its use even more horrific.
As it's shown later in TGS, Rand starts then to see balefire as a common weapon. He already contemplates to balefire Tam and all the Seanchan. The next possible step would be that Rand considers to balefire whole cities, which don't bow to him or if he just believes that a Forsaken is inside the city. Ultimately such an attitude threatens humankind and the Pattern. Therefore balefire is forbidden and to use it widespread as Rand did an atrocity. Even the Forsaken don't want to use balefire this way anymore.
Besides that, Min and Nynaeve apparently - wrongly - believe that someone who was balefired can never be reborn, which would make its use even more horrific.
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1520 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 926 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 764 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 889 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 789 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 763 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 699 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 839 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 754 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 797 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 681 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 765 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 712 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 699 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1194 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 832 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 702 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 382 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 733 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 417 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 686 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 827 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 720 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 729 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 744 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 737 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 731 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 759 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 702 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 685 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 665 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 771 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 648 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 725 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 738 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 751 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 695 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 753 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 697 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 636 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 816 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 740 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 710 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 827 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 667 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 676 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 753 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 688 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 730 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 666 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 670 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 742 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 678 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 824 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 782 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 735 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 767 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 662 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 765 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 752 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 673 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 750 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 761 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 663 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 963 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 705 Views