Active Users:3418 Time:23/01/2025 02:56:25 AM
Re: Wait! Datakim Send a noteboard - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM

In the AoL, men and women linked together and as such, would have linked, likely with angreal and sa'angreal to create such a stream of balefire. From what the books imply, the amount of power used determines how large the beam of balefire will be.


Irrelevant. If a link of 72 could match the power offered by the CK, there would never have been a need to construct them, and the AS could have used a link to create the barrier they were intending to use the CK for.

CK was created at the end of the war, after the whole balefire thing. This means that when those cities were balefired, LESS power was used than CK at maximum.

It seems to me then, that if the power was directly connected to the width of the destruction area, to destroy a city of 100K people would have required a truly humongous amount of power. More than the AoLers had available.

I mean when Rand, the most powerfull channeler, using an angreal creates the most powerfull balefirestream he can, its about the thickness of a man. A meter or so maybe? How big is a city of 100K. Many kilometers certainly. If the only way to increase the thickness of the bar is extra strength. and the most powerfull channeler, with an angreal could only create a bar meter thick, imagine the sheer immense power required to do one several kilometers thick to wipe out a city in a single blow.

So it seems likely to me that there is a way to create a balefire bar that destroyes things in a large area, but only burns things back a short time. Essentially, this strongly implies that a skilled channeler can alter the form of the balefire. It can be a spear directed at a single target with most of the strength in it going to burn the target backwards as much as possible. Or it can be a sort of weapon of mass destruction, where the strength is added to the area effected, while lessening the time the threads burn backwards.

Given that, the most likely explanation to me was that Rand, using LTT knowledge did just that. He used the CK to create a beam wide enough to erase the whole of the palace at a single blow, but still kept the total strength level low to miminize the damage to the pattern.

I should also say that if the pattern could survive the instant annihilation of hundred thousand people at a single instant, how bad could the deaths of 300 people truly be? Adds more credence to the idea that Rand, with LTT's memories knows far better how much the pattern can take than Cadsuane or any other AS.

Seems clear to me, though I do admit that I am pretty tired and going to bed now. Hopefully this will still make sense to me in the morning.

Goodnight all!
Reply to message
Rand the psycho? - 06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM 1544 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM 947 Views
On Balefire - 06/01/2010 04:43:18 AM 944 Views
Good point - 06/01/2010 05:04:26 AM 973 Views
On the nature of BaleFire - 06/01/2010 03:32:25 PM 877 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM 788 Views
Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM 912 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM 811 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM 784 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM 728 Views
Re: Wait! - 06/01/2010 03:55:01 PM 745 Views
I disagree - 06/01/2010 05:42:44 PM 715 Views
Re: I disagree - 06/01/2010 06:41:08 PM 724 Views
Re: I disagree - 07/01/2010 04:42:40 AM 706 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM 859 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM 773 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM 822 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM 705 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM 793 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM 738 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire. - 07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM 722 Views
I agree with Templar - 09/01/2010 04:36:20 PM 731 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions. - 06/01/2010 07:57:54 AM 819 Views
Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM 858 Views
Re: Rand crossed a line - 06/01/2010 04:16:12 PM 770 Views
But... - 06/01/2010 04:34:02 PM 872 Views
Re: But... - 06/01/2010 06:14:25 PM 692 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently? - 06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM 726 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM 391 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes. - 06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM 753 Views
What? - 06/01/2010 06:20:56 PM 756 Views
Where did you get that? - 06/01/2010 07:09:38 PM 725 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM 427 Views
LOL ... super-death! - 06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM 710 Views
Hah! *NM* - 07/01/2010 12:06:07 AM 348 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:20 AM 711 Views
It makes me think of History of the World Part 1 - 07/01/2010 12:53:33 AM 690 Views
Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM 842 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM 742 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM 753 Views
Re: Yes it was. - 06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM 772 Views
let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM 760 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way - 06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM 760 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts - 06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM 783 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts - 07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM 729 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take. - 07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM 792 Views
Sigh. What mass murder? - 07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM 675 Views
you are kidding right? - 07/01/2010 12:19:58 AM 763 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM 748 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM 754 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM 775 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM 712 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM 778 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM 721 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM 657 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS! - 07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM 840 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully. - 07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM 767 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM 738 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 01:53:25 PM 700 Views
Re: OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol: - 08/01/2010 02:56:41 PM 761 Views
What might work... - 08/01/2010 12:35:17 PM 685 Views
Re: What might work... - 08/01/2010 11:38:09 PM 692 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again - 06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM 846 Views
Meh - 06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM 693 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM 701 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM 779 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM 711 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good... - 07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM 754 Views
*laughs behind hand* - 07/01/2010 12:05:54 AM 826 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them! - 07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM 692 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM 695 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM 770 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM 701 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing - 07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM 848 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions - 07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM 802 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument. - 07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM 759 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people - 07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM 792 Views
I concede - 07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM 686 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning. - 07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM 787 Views
Tee hee. - 07/01/2010 05:28:52 AM 739 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM 777 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow, - 07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM 700 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM 773 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 09/01/2010 05:56:16 PM 940 Views
Re: I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention - 18/01/2010 01:00:23 PM 1041 Views
Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 11/01/2010 04:47:10 PM 667 Views
Re: Your assertions weaken your overall argument. - 18/01/2010 12:49:26 PM 713 Views

Reply to Message