Wait!
I just realised. RJ says that in the AoL, entire cities were balefired, and hundreds of thousands were killed in one go.
That must mean that there is a way to create a balefire stream wide enough to encompass an entire city with a single blast.
We know that this city destruction happened before the creation of the Choedan Kal. We also know that CK offered more power than anything available to them yet. So it is possible, with less power than CK, to create a wider balefire bar. That must mean that it IS possible to regulate the width&height of the balefire separately from the power, and that Rand who did not want to destroy the world yet, and who had almost full access to LTT at this point could and probably would have created balefire that while wide, was not all that strong in order to minimise the damage.
I just realised. RJ says that in the AoL, entire cities were balefired, and hundreds of thousands were killed in one go.
That must mean that there is a way to create a balefire stream wide enough to encompass an entire city with a single blast.
We know that this city destruction happened before the creation of the Choedan Kal. We also know that CK offered more power than anything available to them yet. So it is possible, with less power than CK, to create a wider balefire bar. That must mean that it IS possible to regulate the width&height of the balefire separately from the power, and that Rand who did not want to destroy the world yet, and who had almost full access to LTT at this point could and probably would have created balefire that while wide, was not all that strong in order to minimise the damage.
Rand the psycho?
06/01/2010 02:53:30 AM
- 1543 Views
I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:07:33 AM
- 946 Views
Re: I cannot follow your assumptions.
06/01/2010 04:59:12 AM
- 787 Views
Wait!
06/01/2010 05:10:33 AM
- 912 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:20:02 AM
- 811 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 05:58:00 AM
- 783 Views
Re: Wait!
06/01/2010 11:46:13 AM
- 727 Views
I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 07:30:56 AM
- 858 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 03:32:24 PM
- 773 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 821 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
06/01/2010 11:19:56 PM
- 704 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:21:50 AM
- 792 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 12:56:26 AM
- 737 Views
Re: I doubt he meant 'in one go' as a single stream of balefire.
07/01/2010 01:46:16 AM
- 721 Views
Of course, I agree with you, esp since I just put forth the idea you support earlier in the thread.
11/01/2010 04:58:26 PM
- 1215 Views
Rand crossed a line
06/01/2010 02:36:42 PM
- 857 Views
Doesn't Balefire remove your thread from the Pattern permanently?
06/01/2010 02:55:38 PM
- 726 Views
No, RJ stated balefired people can be reborn. *NM*
06/01/2010 03:26:00 PM
- 390 Views
But not in this turning of the Wheel. So they'd miss out on MANY lifetimes.
06/01/2010 05:46:04 PM
- 753 Views
No, balefire just kills you backwards in time. It is not super-death. *NM*
06/01/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 426 Views
LOL ... super-death!
06/01/2010 11:59:31 PM
- 710 Views
Yes it was.
06/01/2010 06:51:15 PM
- 841 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 07:16:14 PM
- 741 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 08:58:40 PM
- 752 Views
Re: Yes it was.
06/01/2010 10:47:11 PM
- 772 Views
let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:26:43 PM
- 760 Views
Re: let me ask the question in a different way
06/01/2010 11:40:56 PM
- 759 Views
actually that quote supports my thoughts
06/01/2010 11:50:40 PM
- 782 Views
Re: actually that quote supports my thoughts
07/01/2010 12:10:07 AM
- 729 Views
yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 715 Views
Re: yet it could take him some undetermined amount of time to figure out your dead?
07/01/2010 01:13:40 AM
- 687 Views
Meh. I just think advocating mass-murder is the opposite direction RJ meant for this to take.
07/01/2010 12:00:44 AM
- 791 Views
Sigh. What mass murder?
07/01/2010 12:15:01 AM
- 674 Views
In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:14:32 PM
- 748 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 03:57:43 PM
- 753 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:13:21 PM
- 774 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 07:52:24 PM
- 711 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 08:56:43 PM
- 777 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:26:01 PM
- 720 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:30:45 PM
- 656 Views
Personally I'm kind of sick of Rand being the only person killing FS!
07/01/2010 09:42:57 PM
- 839 Views
Re: In this book Rand was a wimp and a bully.
07/01/2010 09:56:02 PM
- 766 Views
OK I'm sorry but this gets a huge ROFL :lol:
07/01/2010 10:30:19 PM
- 737 Views
Yes. Anakin Skywalker all over again
06/01/2010 11:01:02 PM
- 846 Views
Meh
06/01/2010 11:30:24 PM
- 692 Views
The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:33:32 PM
- 700 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:50:37 PM
- 778 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
06/01/2010 11:55:03 PM
- 711 Views
I do have to guiltily say, though, that if Rand had balefired the Seanchan and THEN became good...
07/01/2010 12:03:20 AM
- 753 Views
Re: The worst part about his atrocities is his rationalizing them!
07/01/2010 12:23:11 AM
- 691 Views
I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 12:52:25 AM
- 694 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 01:24:32 AM
- 769 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 03:33:52 PM
- 700 Views
Re: I don't think Rand or LTT (who has/have) little capacity for Healing
07/01/2010 04:28:18 PM
- 847 Views
right cause all Generals are so well versed in medical conditions
07/01/2010 09:44:09 PM
- 801 Views
Nice way to avoid the argument.
07/01/2010 10:00:17 PM
- 758 Views
I'm just done talking in circles. You seem to think that because people
07/01/2010 11:53:05 PM
- 791 Views
I concede
07/01/2010 01:09:11 AM
- 685 Views
You weren't wrong overall, but there were some serious flaws in your reasoning.
07/01/2010 02:43:17 AM
- 786 Views
Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 06:23:09 AM
- 777 Views
Re: Morals are subjective anyhow,
07/01/2010 03:23:59 PM
- 699 Views
I have religious beliefs and that is an absurd contention
09/01/2010 12:00:02 AM
- 772 Views
You are treating Graendal's "pets" as though they were enemy combatants
07/01/2010 03:40:03 PM
- 790 Views
Like I give a damn what a group of professional killers would do.
08/01/2010 11:39:11 PM
- 690 Views
Graendal captured these people as part of the Shadows offensive, Operation Chaos Rules
09/01/2010 12:00:40 AM
- 986 Views
Well, I still liked your first argument. It's a freaking war. The argument ...
07/01/2010 07:08:53 PM
- 732 Views