Active Users:447 Time:04/04/2025 10:19:54 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Shishka Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM
Then again, they'd have to, since otherwise time wouldn't flow in places where there are no living things... Confusing, a bit.


It seems you equate "time flow" with "threads", which I'm not sure I understand.

Regardless though, when we see the Brown Ajah section of the WT switch places with the Novice section, we see physical objects (wall stones, floor tiles, tapestries, etc.) MOVE with respect to other objects. And it's hard for me to imagine how that could occur (given my admittedly limited understanding of what the Pattern actually is) if those objects didn't have threads.

Anyway, as to balefire affecting objects, I'm pretty sure it doesn't - we have several examples of balefiring objects and the things on top of them falling to the ground, such as Rand against Rahvin (The Threads Burn) or Jeaine Caide wielding that balefire ter'angreal in the Panarch's Palace (Into the Palace). If objects were balefired back in time, those things would already be on the ground.


By "affecting", I guess you mean that balefire doesn't cause objects to cease to exist backwards in time. I'd have to go back and read the examples you cited to be sure, but I assume you're right about them. Seems a bit odd that object threads would react differently to balefire than living threads, but if that's the way it is, who am I to argue?
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2370 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) randfandom - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1126 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 988 Views
Nynaeve's boat... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 958 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 838 Views
Good point ... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 809 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4542 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Shishka - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 793 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 813 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 731 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 761 Views
BS is definitely wrong here BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 781 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 753 Views
There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 799 Views
Re: There is another way... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 835 Views
Re: There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 749 Views
Nope randfandom - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 832 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 949 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 776 Views
Exactly! *NM* fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 412 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 799 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 714 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 659 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 977 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? BlackAdder - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 820 Views
Balefire is so confusing Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 832 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 809 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* lilltempest - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 407 Views
Clearly dead Etzel - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 980 Views
Re: Clearly dead Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 847 Views
Re: Clearly dead Datakim - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 796 Views
I think... Etzel - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 801 Views
No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 876 Views
Re: No way. Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 745 Views
Re: No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 782 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 396 Views
She's dead as dead gets. everynametaken - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 719 Views
Dead is my bet Sidious - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 746 Views
She's dead *NM* Simon - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 378 Views
Dead. *NM* AgentOrange - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 380 Views
I think she's alive. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 760 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? Syraelle - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 843 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer Gher - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 813 Views
perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:06:49 PM 752 Views
Re: perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:42:17 PM 787 Views
What if.. Tweak - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 720 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive Wotmaniac Reborn - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 736 Views
Well... Heiko - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 950 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes