Active Users:562 Time:23/02/2025 09:36:06 PM
I think... Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM
Agree with the first part - that's what I was trying to say, essentially. As for the second ... I don't think Moridin's instructions meant she had to stay in AD. He didn't say she had to involve herself directly, only that he wanted certain things to happen to Rand. She could have accomplished that by ordering DFs or Compelling other people, from just about anywhere. I doubt she'd ever have risked direct contact with Rand.


RJ/BS just wanted to show Graendal at one point and remind the readers where she is, what she does etc., before she is killed later. The prologue seems like a perfect place for this.

Likely Granedal even did a bit plotting in the meantime, e.g. influencing some members of the Council of Merchants, getting reports from her spies and rallying DF. IIRC, there also wasn't that much time between Moridin's order in the prologue and Graendal's death, so that it's not implausible that she just started to get her plans concerning Rand in motion and stayed in Arad Doman till then.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Hmmm ... just because she'll only be mentioned a few times doesn't mean she's dead. We know ToM will mostly focus on Mat & Perrin (and Elayne?), so I wouldn't expect Graendal to play much of a role in ToM even if she were alive.


IMO, BS just didn't want to give a "Graendal is toast"-confirmation yet, because we shall discuss it a bit more. But ToM will make clear that Graendal must be dead and after this book BS will give us a definite "Graendal is toast"-quote (similar to the situation of Sammael's death).

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.

Presumably, the balefire stream Rand used to kill Semirhage & Elza was narrow - narrow enough that it only hit them, not the bracelets. Whereas, the balefire stream Rand used to destroy the palace was HUGELY WIDE - wide enough to wipe out the entire palace and everything in it, presumably. I don't have the book in front of me, but I recall that it was said that there was nothing left where the palace had been standing.


But apparently their shoes were balefired, too.

In Graendal's case it's said that "a column of pure whiteness exploded from him [Rand] and burned across the silent night sky, illuminating the trees below it in a wave. It moved as quick as a snap of the fingers, striking the wall of the distant fortress. The stones came alight, as if they were breathing in the force of the energy. The entire fortress glowed, transforming into living light, an amazing, spectacular palace of unadulterated energy. It was beautiful. And then it was gone."

So, initially only one wall is hit by the balefire column, but then the whole palace vanishes (which doesn't necessarily mean though, that there might not lie Graendal's small angreal somewhere on the field and Rand was just too distant to notice).
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2356 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1109 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 978 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 944 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 822 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 799 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4530 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 783 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 801 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 719 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 747 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 768 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 742 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 785 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 822 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 736 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 821 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 939 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 765 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 406 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 790 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 701 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 648 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 965 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 808 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 818 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 797 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 401 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 966 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 838 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 786 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 791 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 865 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 734 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 771 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 390 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 709 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 735 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 366 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 374 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 746 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 829 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 802 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 708 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 726 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 934 Views

Reply to Message