1) Objects don't have threads in the Pattern, so destroying the angreal doesn't undo anything, it just destroys the angreal.
This seems to be a bone of contention. See Datakim's post above, for evidence to the contrary.
2) Why would Graendal ever take it off? It's a ring, she can wear it 24/10, and I would be very surprised if she didn't.
That's a good point. If it were a bulky statue or something, you could see her putting it down. But a ring, in a situation where she would presumably have been more cautious/alert than normal? It does seem unlikely.
Graendal is dead. I actually didn't get a huge letdown over her death. I can't really think of any other way for Rand to get rid of her. She was smarter than him, and she was never going to stand and fight him. He beat her.
I don't have a problem with Graendal's death in this manner, either. I was just trying to think of a plausible way she may still be alive. But, all the feedback I'm getting is making me think that my "plausible" way is not so "plausible" after all.
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM
- 2324 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM
- 1082 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?)
05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM
- 952 Views
Nynaeve's boat...
05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM
- 909 Views
Good point ...
05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM
- 765 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM
- 4497 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM
- 747 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads.
05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM
- 767 Views
There is another way...
05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM
- 754 Views
Nope
06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM
- 788 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself...
06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM
- 905 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves?
06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM
- 731 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion?
06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM
- 765 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little
06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM
- 671 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted?
07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM
- 625 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM*
05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM
- 384 Views
I think she's alive.
06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM
- 720 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it?
06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM
- 796 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer
06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM
- 768 Views
perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves!
06/01/2010 11:06:49 PM
- 702 Views
Re: perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves!
07/01/2010 03:42:17 PM
- 743 Views