Active Users:808 Time:23/12/2024 03:23:29 AM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2295 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1058 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 926 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 888 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 773 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 746 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4479 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 716 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 741 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 666 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 699 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 709 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 683 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 728 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 765 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 688 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 765 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 883 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 707 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 374 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 742 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 647 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 599 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 903 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 765 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 770 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 743 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 371 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 910 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 784 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 734 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 739 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 794 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 684 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 711 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 364 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 661 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 678 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 344 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 350 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 696 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 772 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 747 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 647 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 667 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 871 Views

Reply to Message