Active Users:375 Time:27/04/2025 05:46:17 PM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2379 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1134 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1001 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 968 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 850 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 818 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4551 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 804 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 822 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 742 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 773 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 791 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 763 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 808 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 846 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 762 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 841 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 960 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 788 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 416 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 810 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 724 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 672 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 988 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 829 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 845 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 820 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 411 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 991 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 858 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 806 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 815 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 886 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 755 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 795 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 401 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 733 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 756 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 382 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 385 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 770 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 857 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 823 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 728 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 747 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 959 Views

Reply to Message