Active Users:934 Time:23/02/2025 09:00:23 PM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2356 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1109 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 978 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 943 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 821 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 798 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4530 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 782 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 800 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 719 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 747 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 767 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 741 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 784 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 822 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 736 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 821 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 938 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 765 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 405 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 789 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 701 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 648 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 965 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 807 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 817 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 796 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 400 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 966 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 838 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 785 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 790 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 864 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 733 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 771 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 389 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 709 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 735 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 365 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 373 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 745 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 828 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 801 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 708 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 726 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 934 Views

Reply to Message