Active Users:466 Time:07/04/2026 01:22:46 PM
wasn't that their plan? to take it all? nigelgoboom Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 06:50:20 PM
the ancient wrong was not necessarily the collapse of the empire, but everyone that carved it up into little pieces instead of supporting one ruler "for the good of all" kinda thing.

they would have probably been fine if they showed back up and one of hawkwing's descendants was ruling all of it. but they showed up and found vast stretches emtpy "lawless" land and warring countries with the common folks suffering form the wars just like before hawkwing took over.

or maybe the ancient wrong is collaring of women
Reply to message
Ancient Wrong - 03/01/2010 02:55:56 PM 1616 Views
Your theory ignores the word "Again," an important word IMO *NM* - 03/01/2010 03:14:43 PM 529 Views
As much as I'd like to see it happen - 03/01/2010 05:20:54 PM 965 Views
I would like to see it aswell - 04/01/2010 02:20:38 AM 837 Views
What does "Again" mean anyway? - 03/01/2010 09:13:27 PM 1649 Views
This is probably wrong but.. - 03/01/2010 05:56:34 PM 893 Views
I don't think it fits - 04/01/2010 02:13:21 AM 907 Views
always thought it was the carving up of hawkwing's empire. *NM* - 03/01/2010 07:22:09 PM 398 Views
How would this be fixed? - 04/01/2010 02:03:25 AM 789 Views
wasn't that their plan? to take it all? - 05/01/2010 06:50:20 PM 825 Views
i always thought - 03/01/2010 08:45:40 PM 884 Views
Maybe mareth'damane are the ancient wrong & the Seanchan come to fix that problem - 04/01/2010 12:23:28 AM 1016 Views
Maybe. - 04/01/2010 01:47:29 AM 955 Views
Re: Ancient Wrong - 04/01/2010 12:41:55 AM 963 Views
Re: Ancient Wrong - 04/01/2010 01:59:26 AM 878 Views
Honestly... - 04/01/2010 02:35:48 AM 852 Views
Re: Honestly... - 04/01/2010 02:53:42 AM 835 Views
But it fits better than the a'dam issue. - 04/01/2010 05:24:28 AM 949 Views
I am 90% sure it was the attack on the White Tower - 04/01/2010 03:13:55 AM 854 Views
Re: Ancient Wrong - 04/01/2010 04:47:15 AM 823 Views
Re: Ancient Wrong - Fain? - 04/01/2010 06:20:40 AM 833 Views

Reply to Message