Active Users:2466 Time:23/01/2025 12:35:38 PM
Re: Which is exactly what I envisage the AOL distribution to have looked like... darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 04/01/2010 03:29:47 PM
Top Forsaken and Lews Therin as super geniuses of their time, the average person in the Egwene strength range and modern Aes Sedai 'not strong enough to be let outside without a keeper' as Rahvin so eloquently described them.

Channelers have been growing weaker over the last 3000 years. 1000 years ago there were more women of Egwene's strength, and 100 years ago there were something like 20 women of Moiraine's strength in the Tower, according to Cadsuane. I'm sure you'll correct me by saying it was actually 40 women 200 years ago or something-which doesn't change the concept of weakaning channelers in the slightest. Go back 300 years and the average woman was more than twice as strong as the average woman today.


Do you have a quote supporting that anywhere? We know there are fewer channelers, but the evidence (women like Talaan, Sharina, Alivia and Nynaeve) shows that strength hasn't been messed with.

I contend that women like Egwene are in no way average. You've never been able to show a quote supporting this, and you brush off things like Moghedien noting Elayne's Strength as "oh she was really only speaking to Nynaeve" ... If someone from the AoL is telling us that Elayne/Egwene is "Strong enough to be troublesome" I'm going to believe that they are far from average.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
One Power strength - critical analysis of previous posts and some further ideas - 03/01/2010 07:59:24 AM 2387 Views
I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add... - 03/01/2010 02:58:05 PM 1093 Views
Re: I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add... - 03/01/2010 04:37:56 PM 904 Views
where is this phantom quote of Egwene "not standing a chance" - 03/01/2010 05:20:20 PM 793 Views
Here's the real quote - 03/01/2010 05:38:59 PM 852 Views
Well that quote perfectly illustrates the skewed way in which you interpret the evidence... - 03/01/2010 06:18:22 PM 817 Views
I also think the quote is specific - 03/01/2010 06:34:38 PM 824 Views
Skill not Strength is the key that and the potential that another FS was with her - 03/01/2010 06:51:46 PM 832 Views
Bah - 03/01/2010 07:13:01 PM 782 Views
Who's arguing that? - 03/01/2010 07:34:21 PM 751 Views
What ARE you arguing? - 03/01/2010 07:43:06 PM 821 Views
Precisely... - 03/01/2010 07:56:24 PM 761 Views
Just like Asmos killer - 03/01/2010 08:00:21 PM 838 Views
That there is far more to strength in her quote! - 03/01/2010 08:05:20 PM 718 Views
Re: That there is far more to strength in her quote! - 04/01/2010 09:40:05 AM 916 Views
and where do I ever say Elayne is only a small step below Moghedien? - 04/01/2010 03:08:37 PM 814 Views
You more than imply it with your own list - 04/01/2010 03:39:06 PM 826 Views
and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else - 04/01/2010 05:05:54 PM 761 Views
Re: and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else - 04/01/2010 06:46:45 PM 1157 Views
there are no absolutes - 04/01/2010 08:49:46 PM 1213 Views
I agree with Darius Sedai. - 06/01/2010 07:49:10 PM 691 Views
- 03/01/2010 06:46:12 PM 845 Views
Calm down, please... - 03/01/2010 07:11:11 PM 907 Views
I'm not upset - 03/01/2010 07:33:00 PM 784 Views
Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point - 03/01/2010 03:09:55 PM 912 Views
Re: Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point - 03/01/2010 04:39:25 PM 825 Views
Which makes sense - 03/01/2010 05:15:24 PM 798 Views
Really? - 03/01/2010 06:09:22 PM 725 Views
All I'm saying is that information on the internet should - 04/01/2010 06:08:27 AM 758 Views
I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post - 03/01/2010 05:16:39 PM 1026 Views
Lanfear quote - 03/01/2010 05:37:50 PM 840 Views
Read RJ's quote again... - 03/01/2010 06:13:42 PM 759 Views
Nothing is perfect - 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM 907 Views
Re: I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post - 03/01/2010 06:31:09 PM 947 Views
It's actually not that complicated ... simple math actually - 03/01/2010 07:08:52 PM 823 Views
Yes, but to think that RJ put that much effort into it is improbable - 03/01/2010 07:19:13 PM 831 Views
I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 03/01/2010 07:56:17 PM 749 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 09:50:38 AM 860 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 03:26:10 PM 938 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 03:52:19 PM 807 Views
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth - 04/01/2010 05:09:15 PM 753 Views
Dude - 04/01/2010 06:21:28 PM 708 Views
Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post - 04/01/2010 06:35:03 PM 750 Views
Re: Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post - 04/01/2010 06:49:42 PM 766 Views
Then how can you know? - 04/01/2010 08:17:46 PM 832 Views
A reply... - 03/01/2010 06:02:33 PM 760 Views
The Tower sample is skewed allright, but to the upper side of the strength range... - 03/01/2010 06:36:45 PM 893 Views
I agree - Aes Sedai are stronger in the Power - 03/01/2010 07:26:45 PM 958 Views
Re: A reply... - 03/01/2010 07:09:55 PM 884 Views
I think distance is related to Strength - 03/01/2010 07:21:46 PM 803 Views
Maybe, but to what conclusion? - 03/01/2010 07:29:39 PM 778 Views
OOps, missed part of the quote ... sorry about that! - 03/01/2010 07:59:20 PM 722 Views
Re: A reply... - 03/01/2010 08:38:07 PM 920 Views
Re: A reply... - 04/01/2010 10:10:13 AM 896 Views
So many double standards. - 04/01/2010 09:02:23 PM 801 Views
I agree with most of this - 03/01/2010 08:19:37 PM 892 Views
Re: I agree with most of this - 04/01/2010 10:19:12 AM 834 Views
amusing side note - 04/01/2010 05:22:39 AM 751 Views
Which is exactly what I envisage the AOL distribution to have looked like... - 04/01/2010 07:03:51 AM 695 Views
Re: Which is exactly what I envisage the AOL distribution to have looked like... - 04/01/2010 03:29:47 PM 778 Views

Reply to Message