Active Users:735 Time:18/03/2026 09:51:36 AM
Nothing is perfect darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM
He said:

"following a bell curve distribution in strength."

Not a bell curve distribution in strength levels. In your range of 1 to 441, the average woman would be at strength 220.5, not 121.


Yeah I know, but let's face it we're all trying to force fit evidence :)

What we have from the books fits to the 21 level list with 11 being the Mean/Median/Mode more closely than trying to fit the average woman at 50% of the strongest...

RJ could simply have been attributing strength to the levels.

Ultimately there is no perfect answer (because RJ wanted the freedom to write as he needed), but IMO this scale works as closely to the evidence as anything I've seen :)

1. It maps to the Strength differences between Egwene and Nynaeve, while still allowing for Moghedien, Tamela and Viendre
2. It explains how/why AS power differences are so wide, but still allows for even larger power gaps at the top levels.
3. It gives plausible reasons for Rand being so much stronger than any woman but allows for dexterity to narrow the gap when the most skilled of channelers face him (i.e. Lanfear could face him easily despite being significantly weaker in raw strength).
4. It shows how 3 weak AS can hold one of the FS
5. It explains how Nynaeve could match Moghedien as far back as TSR and why Egwene/Elayne were so much weaker than Rand.
6. It fits A Bell Curve (granted on levels not absolute strength).
7. It fits with the BWB statement that most channelers were fairly weak (thus the Curve being centered on levels not strength).
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
One Power strength - critical analysis of previous posts and some further ideas - 03/01/2010 07:59:24 AM 2695 Views
I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add... - 03/01/2010 02:58:05 PM 1346 Views
Re: I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add... - 03/01/2010 04:37:56 PM 1187 Views
where is this phantom quote of Egwene "not standing a chance" - 03/01/2010 05:20:20 PM 1052 Views
Here's the real quote - 03/01/2010 05:38:59 PM 1078 Views
Well that quote perfectly illustrates the skewed way in which you interpret the evidence... - 03/01/2010 06:18:22 PM 1111 Views
I also think the quote is specific - 03/01/2010 06:34:38 PM 1093 Views
Skill not Strength is the key that and the potential that another FS was with her - 03/01/2010 06:51:46 PM 1076 Views
Bah - 03/01/2010 07:13:01 PM 1030 Views
Who's arguing that? - 03/01/2010 07:34:21 PM 999 Views
What ARE you arguing? - 03/01/2010 07:43:06 PM 1048 Views
Precisely... - 03/01/2010 07:56:24 PM 993 Views
Just like Asmos killer - 03/01/2010 08:00:21 PM 1121 Views
That there is far more to strength in her quote! - 03/01/2010 08:05:20 PM 940 Views
Re: That there is far more to strength in her quote! - 04/01/2010 09:40:05 AM 1153 Views
and where do I ever say Elayne is only a small step below Moghedien? - 04/01/2010 03:08:37 PM 1064 Views
You more than imply it with your own list - 04/01/2010 03:39:06 PM 1079 Views
and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else - 04/01/2010 05:05:54 PM 1055 Views
Re: and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else - 04/01/2010 06:46:45 PM 1466 Views
there are no absolutes - 04/01/2010 08:49:46 PM 1485 Views
I agree with Darius Sedai. - 06/01/2010 07:49:10 PM 936 Views
- 03/01/2010 06:46:12 PM 1108 Views
Calm down, please... - 03/01/2010 07:11:11 PM 1157 Views
I'm not upset - 03/01/2010 07:33:00 PM 1057 Views
Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point - 03/01/2010 03:09:55 PM 1203 Views
Re: Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point - 03/01/2010 04:39:25 PM 1116 Views
Which makes sense - 03/01/2010 05:15:24 PM 1019 Views
Really? - 03/01/2010 06:09:22 PM 984 Views
All I'm saying is that information on the internet should - 04/01/2010 06:08:27 AM 988 Views
I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post - 03/01/2010 05:16:39 PM 1289 Views
Lanfear quote - 03/01/2010 05:37:50 PM 1055 Views
Read RJ's quote again... - 03/01/2010 06:13:42 PM 999 Views
Nothing is perfect - 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM 1174 Views
Re: I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post - 03/01/2010 06:31:09 PM 1211 Views
It's actually not that complicated ... simple math actually - 03/01/2010 07:08:52 PM 1058 Views
Yes, but to think that RJ put that much effort into it is improbable - 03/01/2010 07:19:13 PM 1101 Views
I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 03/01/2010 07:56:17 PM 1006 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 09:50:38 AM 1133 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 03:26:10 PM 1181 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 03:52:19 PM 1053 Views
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth - 04/01/2010 05:09:15 PM 1001 Views
Dude - 04/01/2010 06:21:28 PM 953 Views
Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post - 04/01/2010 06:35:03 PM 1028 Views
Re: Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post - 04/01/2010 06:49:42 PM 974 Views
Then how can you know? - 04/01/2010 08:17:46 PM 1085 Views
A reply... - 03/01/2010 06:02:33 PM 1014 Views
The Tower sample is skewed allright, but to the upper side of the strength range... - 03/01/2010 06:36:45 PM 1200 Views
I agree - Aes Sedai are stronger in the Power - 03/01/2010 07:26:45 PM 1403 Views
Re: A reply... - 03/01/2010 07:09:55 PM 1129 Views
I think distance is related to Strength - 03/01/2010 07:21:46 PM 1036 Views
Maybe, but to what conclusion? - 03/01/2010 07:29:39 PM 1005 Views
OOps, missed part of the quote ... sorry about that! - 03/01/2010 07:59:20 PM 986 Views
Re: A reply... - 03/01/2010 08:38:07 PM 1214 Views
Re: A reply... - 04/01/2010 10:10:13 AM 1152 Views
So many double standards. - 04/01/2010 09:02:23 PM 1061 Views
I agree with most of this - 03/01/2010 08:19:37 PM 1154 Views
Re: I agree with most of this - 04/01/2010 10:19:12 AM 1087 Views
amusing side note - 04/01/2010 05:22:39 AM 1003 Views

Reply to Message