Active Users:353 Time:26/04/2025 01:30:22 PM
Nothing is perfect darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM
He said:

"following a bell curve distribution in strength."

Not a bell curve distribution in strength levels. In your range of 1 to 441, the average woman would be at strength 220.5, not 121.


Yeah I know, but let's face it we're all trying to force fit evidence :)

What we have from the books fits to the 21 level list with 11 being the Mean/Median/Mode more closely than trying to fit the average woman at 50% of the strongest...

RJ could simply have been attributing strength to the levels.

Ultimately there is no perfect answer (because RJ wanted the freedom to write as he needed), but IMO this scale works as closely to the evidence as anything I've seen :)

1. It maps to the Strength differences between Egwene and Nynaeve, while still allowing for Moghedien, Tamela and Viendre
2. It explains how/why AS power differences are so wide, but still allows for even larger power gaps at the top levels.
3. It gives plausible reasons for Rand being so much stronger than any woman but allows for dexterity to narrow the gap when the most skilled of channelers face him (i.e. Lanfear could face him easily despite being significantly weaker in raw strength).
4. It shows how 3 weak AS can hold one of the FS
5. It explains how Nynaeve could match Moghedien as far back as TSR and why Egwene/Elayne were so much weaker than Rand.
6. It fits A Bell Curve (granted on levels not absolute strength).
7. It fits with the BWB statement that most channelers were fairly weak (thus the Curve being centered on levels not strength).
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
One Power strength - critical analysis of previous posts and some further ideas - 03/01/2010 07:59:24 AM 2442 Views
I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add... - 03/01/2010 02:58:05 PM 1152 Views
Re: I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add... - 03/01/2010 04:37:56 PM 958 Views
where is this phantom quote of Egwene "not standing a chance" - 03/01/2010 05:20:20 PM 849 Views
Here's the real quote - 03/01/2010 05:38:59 PM 904 Views
Well that quote perfectly illustrates the skewed way in which you interpret the evidence... - 03/01/2010 06:18:22 PM 885 Views
I also think the quote is specific - 03/01/2010 06:34:38 PM 880 Views
Skill not Strength is the key that and the potential that another FS was with her - 03/01/2010 06:51:46 PM 889 Views
Bah - 03/01/2010 07:13:01 PM 858 Views
Who's arguing that? - 03/01/2010 07:34:21 PM 804 Views
What ARE you arguing? - 03/01/2010 07:43:06 PM 875 Views
Precisely... - 03/01/2010 07:56:24 PM 813 Views
Just like Asmos killer - 03/01/2010 08:00:21 PM 897 Views
That there is far more to strength in her quote! - 03/01/2010 08:05:20 PM 762 Views
Re: That there is far more to strength in her quote! - 04/01/2010 09:40:05 AM 970 Views
and where do I ever say Elayne is only a small step below Moghedien? - 04/01/2010 03:08:37 PM 863 Views
You more than imply it with your own list - 04/01/2010 03:39:06 PM 884 Views
and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else - 04/01/2010 05:05:54 PM 815 Views
Re: and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else - 04/01/2010 06:46:45 PM 1209 Views
there are no absolutes - 04/01/2010 08:49:46 PM 1267 Views
I agree with Darius Sedai. - 06/01/2010 07:49:10 PM 746 Views
- 03/01/2010 06:46:12 PM 896 Views
Calm down, please... - 03/01/2010 07:11:11 PM 967 Views
I'm not upset - 03/01/2010 07:33:00 PM 847 Views
Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point - 03/01/2010 03:09:55 PM 967 Views
Re: Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point - 03/01/2010 04:39:25 PM 889 Views
Which makes sense - 03/01/2010 05:15:24 PM 847 Views
Really? - 03/01/2010 06:09:22 PM 784 Views
All I'm saying is that information on the internet should - 04/01/2010 06:08:27 AM 818 Views
I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post - 03/01/2010 05:16:39 PM 1079 Views
Lanfear quote - 03/01/2010 05:37:50 PM 892 Views
Read RJ's quote again... - 03/01/2010 06:13:42 PM 811 Views
Nothing is perfect - 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM 970 Views
Re: I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post - 03/01/2010 06:31:09 PM 1010 Views
It's actually not that complicated ... simple math actually - 03/01/2010 07:08:52 PM 877 Views
Yes, but to think that RJ put that much effort into it is improbable - 03/01/2010 07:19:13 PM 888 Views
I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 03/01/2010 07:56:17 PM 800 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 09:50:38 AM 927 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 03:26:10 PM 988 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 03:52:19 PM 859 Views
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth - 04/01/2010 05:09:15 PM 808 Views
Dude - 04/01/2010 06:21:28 PM 766 Views
Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post - 04/01/2010 06:35:03 PM 801 Views
Re: Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post - 04/01/2010 06:49:42 PM 812 Views
Then how can you know? - 04/01/2010 08:17:46 PM 885 Views
A reply... - 03/01/2010 06:02:33 PM 822 Views
The Tower sample is skewed allright, but to the upper side of the strength range... - 03/01/2010 06:36:45 PM 968 Views
I agree - Aes Sedai are stronger in the Power - 03/01/2010 07:26:45 PM 1046 Views
Re: A reply... - 03/01/2010 07:09:55 PM 942 Views
I think distance is related to Strength - 03/01/2010 07:21:46 PM 858 Views
Maybe, but to what conclusion? - 03/01/2010 07:29:39 PM 832 Views
OOps, missed part of the quote ... sorry about that! - 03/01/2010 07:59:20 PM 772 Views
Re: A reply... - 03/01/2010 08:38:07 PM 969 Views
Re: A reply... - 04/01/2010 10:10:13 AM 959 Views
So many double standards. - 04/01/2010 09:02:23 PM 852 Views
I agree with most of this - 03/01/2010 08:19:37 PM 942 Views
Re: I agree with most of this - 04/01/2010 10:19:12 AM 881 Views
amusing side note - 04/01/2010 05:22:39 AM 802 Views

Reply to Message