He said:
"following a bell curve distribution in strength."
Not a bell curve distribution in strength levels. In your range of 1 to 441, the average woman would be at strength 220.5, not 121.
"following a bell curve distribution in strength."
Not a bell curve distribution in strength levels. In your range of 1 to 441, the average woman would be at strength 220.5, not 121.
Yeah I know, but let's face it we're all trying to force fit evidence

What we have from the books fits to the 21 level list with 11 being the Mean/Median/Mode more closely than trying to fit the average woman at 50% of the strongest...
RJ could simply have been attributing strength to the levels.
Ultimately there is no perfect answer (because RJ wanted the freedom to write as he needed), but IMO this scale works as closely to the evidence as anything I've seen

1. It maps to the Strength differences between Egwene and Nynaeve, while still allowing for Moghedien, Tamela and Viendre
2. It explains how/why AS power differences are so wide, but still allows for even larger power gaps at the top levels.
3. It gives plausible reasons for Rand being so much stronger than any woman but allows for dexterity to narrow the gap when the most skilled of channelers face him (i.e. Lanfear could face him easily despite being significantly weaker in raw strength).
4. It shows how 3 weak AS can hold one of the FS
5. It explains how Nynaeve could match Moghedien as far back as TSR and why Egwene/Elayne were so much weaker than Rand.
6. It fits A Bell Curve (granted on levels not absolute strength).
7. It fits with the BWB statement that most channelers were fairly weak (thus the Curve being centered on levels not strength).
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
One Power strength - critical analysis of previous posts and some further ideas
- 03/01/2010 07:59:24 AM
2829 Views
I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add...
- 03/01/2010 02:58:05 PM
1472 Views
where is this phantom quote of Egwene "not standing a chance"
- 03/01/2010 05:20:20 PM
1158 Views
Here's the real quote
- 03/01/2010 05:38:59 PM
1209 Views
Well that quote perfectly illustrates the skewed way in which you interpret the evidence...
- 03/01/2010 06:18:22 PM
1259 Views
I also think the quote is specific
- 03/01/2010 06:34:38 PM
1204 Views
Skill not Strength is the key that and the potential that another FS was with her
- 03/01/2010 06:51:46 PM
1188 Views
Bah
- 03/01/2010 07:13:01 PM
1147 Views
Who's arguing that?
- 03/01/2010 07:34:21 PM
1125 Views
What ARE you arguing?
- 03/01/2010 07:43:06 PM
1175 Views
That there is far more to strength in her quote!
- 03/01/2010 08:05:20 PM
1063 Views
Re: That there is far more to strength in her quote!
- 04/01/2010 09:40:05 AM
1285 Views
and where do I ever say Elayne is only a small step below Moghedien?
- 04/01/2010 03:08:37 PM
1183 Views
You more than imply it with your own list
- 04/01/2010 03:39:06 PM
1219 Views
and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else
- 04/01/2010 05:05:54 PM
1186 Views
Re: and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else
- 04/01/2010 06:46:45 PM
1616 Views
Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point
- 03/01/2010 03:09:55 PM
1338 Views
Re: Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point
- 03/01/2010 04:39:25 PM
1236 Views
I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post
- 03/01/2010 05:16:39 PM
1412 Views
Read RJ's quote again...
- 03/01/2010 06:13:42 PM
1101 Views
Nothing is perfect
- 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM
1301 Views
- 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM
1301 Views
Re: I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post
- 03/01/2010 06:31:09 PM
1353 Views
It's actually not that complicated ... simple math actually
- 03/01/2010 07:08:52 PM
1195 Views
Yes, but to think that RJ put that much effort into it is improbable
- 03/01/2010 07:19:13 PM
1213 Views
I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things!
- 03/01/2010 07:56:17 PM
1151 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things!
- 04/01/2010 09:50:38 AM
1260 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things!
- 04/01/2010 03:26:10 PM
1298 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things!
- 04/01/2010 03:52:19 PM
1173 Views
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth
- 04/01/2010 05:09:15 PM
1109 Views
Dude
- 04/01/2010 06:21:28 PM
1084 Views
Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post
- 04/01/2010 06:35:03 PM
1165 Views
A reply...
- 03/01/2010 06:02:33 PM
1142 Views
The Tower sample is skewed allright, but to the upper side of the strength range...
- 03/01/2010 06:36:45 PM
1328 Views
Re: A reply...
- 03/01/2010 07:09:55 PM
1259 Views
I think distance is related to Strength
- 03/01/2010 07:21:46 PM
1168 Views
Re: A reply...
- 03/01/2010 08:38:07 PM
1340 Views
amusing side note
- 04/01/2010 05:22:39 AM
1106 Views
Which is exactly what I envisage the AOL distribution to have looked like...
- 04/01/2010 07:03:51 AM
1035 Views
Re: Which is exactly what I envisage the AOL distribution to have looked like...
- 04/01/2010 03:29:47 PM
1133 Views
It may sound silly, but did you look at One Power values in the Wheel of Time CCG?
- 05/01/2010 12:56:41 AM
1662 Views
Re: It may sound silly, but did you look at One Power values in the Wheel of Time CCG?
- 05/01/2010 07:33:21 AM
1250 Views

