Active Users:732 Time:23/12/2024 07:26:46 PM
Nothing is perfect darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM
He said:

"following a bell curve distribution in strength."

Not a bell curve distribution in strength levels. In your range of 1 to 441, the average woman would be at strength 220.5, not 121.


Yeah I know, but let's face it we're all trying to force fit evidence :)

What we have from the books fits to the 21 level list with 11 being the Mean/Median/Mode more closely than trying to fit the average woman at 50% of the strongest...

RJ could simply have been attributing strength to the levels.

Ultimately there is no perfect answer (because RJ wanted the freedom to write as he needed), but IMO this scale works as closely to the evidence as anything I've seen :)

1. It maps to the Strength differences between Egwene and Nynaeve, while still allowing for Moghedien, Tamela and Viendre
2. It explains how/why AS power differences are so wide, but still allows for even larger power gaps at the top levels.
3. It gives plausible reasons for Rand being so much stronger than any woman but allows for dexterity to narrow the gap when the most skilled of channelers face him (i.e. Lanfear could face him easily despite being significantly weaker in raw strength).
4. It shows how 3 weak AS can hold one of the FS
5. It explains how Nynaeve could match Moghedien as far back as TSR and why Egwene/Elayne were so much weaker than Rand.
6. It fits A Bell Curve (granted on levels not absolute strength).
7. It fits with the BWB statement that most channelers were fairly weak (thus the Curve being centered on levels not strength).
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
One Power strength - critical analysis of previous posts and some further ideas - 03/01/2010 07:59:24 AM 2357 Views
I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add... - 03/01/2010 02:58:05 PM 1072 Views
Re: I support your view, with maybe a few comments to add... - 03/01/2010 04:37:56 PM 881 Views
where is this phantom quote of Egwene "not standing a chance" - 03/01/2010 05:20:20 PM 770 Views
Here's the real quote - 03/01/2010 05:38:59 PM 828 Views
Well that quote perfectly illustrates the skewed way in which you interpret the evidence... - 03/01/2010 06:18:22 PM 792 Views
I also think the quote is specific - 03/01/2010 06:34:38 PM 795 Views
Skill not Strength is the key that and the potential that another FS was with her - 03/01/2010 06:51:46 PM 814 Views
Bah - 03/01/2010 07:13:01 PM 755 Views
Who's arguing that? - 03/01/2010 07:34:21 PM 727 Views
What ARE you arguing? - 03/01/2010 07:43:06 PM 797 Views
Precisely... - 03/01/2010 07:56:24 PM 736 Views
Just like Asmos killer - 03/01/2010 08:00:21 PM 812 Views
That there is far more to strength in her quote! - 03/01/2010 08:05:20 PM 692 Views
Re: That there is far more to strength in her quote! - 04/01/2010 09:40:05 AM 889 Views
and where do I ever say Elayne is only a small step below Moghedien? - 04/01/2010 03:08:37 PM 786 Views
You more than imply it with your own list - 04/01/2010 03:39:06 PM 796 Views
and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else - 04/01/2010 05:05:54 PM 741 Views
Re: and you are fixated on simple strength to the exclusion of everything else - 04/01/2010 06:46:45 PM 1131 Views
there are no absolutes - 04/01/2010 08:49:46 PM 1187 Views
I agree with Darius Sedai. - 06/01/2010 07:49:10 PM 665 Views
- 03/01/2010 06:46:12 PM 820 Views
Calm down, please... - 03/01/2010 07:11:11 PM 890 Views
I'm not upset - 03/01/2010 07:33:00 PM 765 Views
Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point - 03/01/2010 03:09:55 PM 888 Views
Re: Tiny Unimportant Objection to "Bell Curve" Point - 03/01/2010 04:39:25 PM 795 Views
Which makes sense - 03/01/2010 05:15:24 PM 775 Views
Really? - 03/01/2010 06:09:22 PM 702 Views
All I'm saying is that information on the internet should - 04/01/2010 06:08:27 AM 729 Views
I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post - 03/01/2010 05:16:39 PM 1000 Views
Lanfear quote - 03/01/2010 05:37:50 PM 817 Views
Read RJ's quote again... - 03/01/2010 06:13:42 PM 733 Views
Nothing is perfect - 03/01/2010 06:33:44 PM 881 Views
Re: I've got a slightly revised opinion than my last post - 03/01/2010 06:31:09 PM 926 Views
It's actually not that complicated ... simple math actually - 03/01/2010 07:08:52 PM 800 Views
Yes, but to think that RJ put that much effort into it is improbable - 03/01/2010 07:19:13 PM 801 Views
I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 03/01/2010 07:56:17 PM 720 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 09:50:38 AM 837 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 03:26:10 PM 909 Views
Re: I'm being harsh with one poster who continues to mis-quote things! - 04/01/2010 03:52:19 PM 784 Views
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth - 04/01/2010 05:09:15 PM 731 Views
Dude - 04/01/2010 06:21:28 PM 685 Views
Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post - 04/01/2010 06:35:03 PM 729 Views
Re: Dude, please go back to Fionwe's post - 04/01/2010 06:49:42 PM 737 Views
Then how can you know? - 04/01/2010 08:17:46 PM 804 Views
A reply... - 03/01/2010 06:02:33 PM 726 Views
The Tower sample is skewed allright, but to the upper side of the strength range... - 03/01/2010 06:36:45 PM 865 Views
I agree - Aes Sedai are stronger in the Power - 03/01/2010 07:26:45 PM 932 Views
Re: A reply... - 03/01/2010 07:09:55 PM 856 Views
I think distance is related to Strength - 03/01/2010 07:21:46 PM 776 Views
Maybe, but to what conclusion? - 03/01/2010 07:29:39 PM 756 Views
OOps, missed part of the quote ... sorry about that! - 03/01/2010 07:59:20 PM 698 Views
Re: A reply... - 03/01/2010 08:38:07 PM 890 Views
Re: A reply... - 04/01/2010 10:10:13 AM 871 Views
So many double standards. - 04/01/2010 09:02:23 PM 777 Views
I agree with most of this - 03/01/2010 08:19:37 PM 868 Views
Re: I agree with most of this - 04/01/2010 10:19:12 AM 808 Views
amusing side note - 04/01/2010 05:22:39 AM 722 Views

Reply to Message