Active Users:1140 Time:23/11/2024 04:03:15 AM
Re: It just occured to me Mysteria Indictus Send a noteboard - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM
Isn't it a bit curious that many Aes Sedai demand of lesser people that they are called by their name and the "honorific Sedai". After all, many or most Aes Sedai and other educated people should know that "sedai" just means "servant" in the Old Tongue. That basically means an Aes Sedai e.g. wants to be properly adressed by a servant/novice as "Servant Lelaine", "Servant Elaida" or "Servant Cadsuane", for example. On the other hand, it's said that a character like Nynaeve often tries to make a point by never adding the honorific Sedai to the name, though that only means that she doesn't call the Aes Sedai servant.


Heh, very true.

But of course, the Aes Sedai of the AoL were proud to serve, so they probably found the title honorific. And the Third Age people probably just carried on the tradition, thinking the OT sounds fancy. A bit as if we internet people would demand to be called by our names and the latin word for "geek". By the way, if someone could enlighten me to what that word might be, I'd be grateful.
//Mysteria Indictus
Previously known as NightShade
Gleeman of the Page of Legends
Reply to message
It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 10:12:12 AM 1369 Views
I tink they did - 31/12/2009 10:52:32 AM 656 Views
Re: It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM 657 Views
Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 11:34:49 AM 635 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM 558 Views
In a democracy though... - 31/12/2009 02:38:21 PM 507 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 04:30:58 PM 560 Views
Depends on what the actual translation is... - 31/12/2009 04:49:54 PM 545 Views
The translation... - 31/12/2009 06:17:07 PM 522 Views
Look at M'Hael - 31/12/2009 08:12:35 PM 549 Views
No... - 31/12/2009 08:19:18 PM 499 Views
And Sedai is not a title? - 31/12/2009 08:47:03 PM 582 Views
Nope, it is an honorific. - 31/12/2009 09:31:37 PM 648 Views
You're really splitting hairs... - 01/01/2010 04:06:02 PM 737 Views
That's why I said I was. - 01/01/2010 06:19:22 PM 648 Views
My 2 cents... which may only be worth 1 - 01/01/2010 06:39:52 PM 623 Views
I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 06:49:25 PM 621 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:27:57 PM 637 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:37:17 PM 603 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 08:08:58 PM 638 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 09:05:45 PM 605 Views
I think we're pretty much in agreement - 01/01/2010 09:26:26 PM 623 Views
I'd agree with that. - 01/01/2010 10:20:52 PM 571 Views
I think it's a pride of humility thing.... - 31/12/2009 06:24:17 PM 578 Views
They don't care. The meaning of the honorific is irrelevant - all significance comes from context - 01/01/2010 06:08:40 AM 542 Views
I Agree - 01/01/2010 08:36:40 AM 495 Views
Re: I Agree - 01/01/2010 03:04:18 PM 489 Views

Reply to Message